» Articles » PMID: 16632745

Truncation Artifact on PET/CT: Impact on Measurements of Activity Concentration and Assessment of a Correction Algorithm

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2006 Apr 25
PMID 16632745
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Discrepancy between fields of view (FOVs) in a PET/CT scanner causes a truncation artifact when imaging extends beyond the CT FOV. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the impact of this artifact on measurements of 18F-FDG activity concentrations and to assess a truncation correction algorithm.

Materials And Methods: Two phantoms and five patients were used in this study. In the first phantom, three inserts (water, air, bone equivalent) were placed in a water-filled cylinder containing 18F-FDG. In the second phantom study, a chest phantom and a 2-L bottle fitted with a bone insert were used to simulate a patient's torso and arm. Both phantoms were imaged while positioned centrally (baseline) and at the edge of the CT FOV to induce truncation. PET images were reconstructed using attenuation maps from truncated and truncation-corrected CT images. Regions of interest (ROIs) drawn on the inserts, simulated arm, and background water of the baseline truncated and truncation-corrected PET images were compared. In addition, extremity malignancies of five patients truncated on CT images were reconstructed with and without correction and the maximum standard uptake values (SUVs) of the malignancies were compared.

Results: Truncation artifact manifests as a rim of high activity concentration at the edge of the truncated CT image with an adjacent low-concentration region peripherally. The correction algorithm minimizes these effects. Phantom studies showed a maximum variation of -5.4% in the truncation-corrected background water image compared with the baseline image. Activity concentration in the water insert was 6.3% higher while that of air and bone inserts was similar to baseline. Extremity malignancies showed a consistent increase in the maximum SUV after truncation correction.

Conclusion: Truncation affects measurements of 18F-FDG activity concentrations in PET/CT. A truncation-correction algorithm corrects truncation artifacts with small residual error.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Single-Shot PET Image Artifact Detection and Disentanglement: Toward Routine Clinical Image Quality Assurance.

Shiri I, Salimi Y, Hervier E, Pezzoni A, Sanaat A, Mostafaei S Clin Nucl Med. 2023; 48(12):1035-1046.

PMID: 37883015 PMC: 10662584. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004912.


Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of multiple tracers on total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Li L, Wan L, Zhao H, Wang C, Wei W, Liu J Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(8):5182-5194.

PMID: 37581077 PMC: 10423372. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1418.


Diagnostic performance of total-body F-FDG PET/CT with fast 2-min acquisition for liver tumours: comparison with conventional PET/CT.

Hu Y, Liu G, Yu H, Gu J, Shi H Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022; 49(10):3538-3546.

PMID: 35344063 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05772-2.


Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.

Tsai Y, Liu C Semin Nucl Med. 2021; 51(6):646-656.

PMID: 34243906 PMC: 8490278. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.015.


Morphology supporting function: attenuation correction for SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging.

Lee T, Alessio A, Miyaoka R, Kinahan P Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 60(1):25-39.

PMID: 26576737 PMC: 5262384.