» Articles » PMID: 16628056

Range of Normal and Abnormal Subacromial/subdeltoid Bursa Fluid

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Apr 22
PMID 16628056
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the range of normal and abnormal subacromial/subdeltoid (SA/SD) bursa fluid.

Methods: Using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scanner, 2 observers evaluated coronal oblique T2-weighted, fast spin echo, fat-suppressed images of 71 persons (36 asymptomatic volunteers and 35 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears [RCTs]) for the 1) widest thickness of the SA/SD bursa; 2) medial extent of bursa from the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ); and 3) because patients were supine, whether fluid was in the posterior quarter, middle quarter, anterior quarter, or anterior-most quarter of the bursa.

Results: The range of bursa thickness was 0 to 7 mm (mean = 1.3 mm, median = 2 mm) in normal bursas and 0 to 8 mm (mean = 3.3 mm, median = 3 mm; P < 0.05, t test) in RCTs. Only 2 volunteers exceeded 3 mm in bursa thickness. In volunteers, 36% had no fluid present, 61% had a small amount of fluid lateral to the ACJ, and 1 had fluid directly beneath the ACJ (P < 0.05). In RCT patients, 37% had fluid directly under the ACJ or medial to the ACJ. Only 1 patient with an RCT had no bursal fluid. In volunteers, most fluid was in the posterior quarter (53%) or middle quarter (22%) of the bursa, whereas in RCT patients, most fluid was located in the anterior quarter of the humerus or anterior to the humerus (89%; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Normal SA/SD bursa fluid is rarely thicker than 2 mm and tends to be located posteriorly. An abnormal amount of fluid is present when the thickness exceeds 3 mm, fluid is present medial to the ACJ, and fluid is seen in the part of the bursa anterior to the humerus.

Citing Articles

Application of deep learning-based image reconstruction in MR imaging of the shoulder joint to improve image quality and reduce scan time.

Kaniewska M, Deininger-Czermak E, Getzmann J, Wang X, Lohezic M, Guggenberger R Eur Radiol. 2022; 33(3):1513-1525.

PMID: 36166084 PMC: 9935676. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09151-1.


Etiologic Factors of Rotator Cuff Disease in Elderly: Modifiable Factors in Addition to Known Demographic Factors.

Son J, Seo Z, Choi W, Lee Y, Kang S, Lee C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35329402 PMC: 8948663. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063715.


Factors Related to Preoperative Shoulder Pain in Patients with Atraumatic Painful Rotator Cuff Tears.

Park I, Lee H, Kim S, Park M, Kim Y Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020; 22(3):128-134.

PMID: 33330208 PMC: 7714281. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2019.22.3.128.


Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder.

Ashir A, Lombardi A, Jerban S, Ma Y, Du J, Chang E Pol J Radiol. 2020; 85:e420-e439.

PMID: 32999695 PMC: 7509696. DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2020.98394.


Combined bursal aspiration and corticosteroid injection for rotator cuff tear patients unresponsive to conservative management: Case report.

Lee D, Cho J Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(34):e21759.

PMID: 32846802 PMC: 7447456. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021759.