» Articles » PMID: 16626487

The Photocurrent Response of Human Cones is Fast and Monophasic

Overview
Journal BMC Neurosci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Apr 22
PMID 16626487
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The precise form of the light response of human cone photoreceptors in vivo has not been established with certainty. To investigate the response shape we compare the predictions of a recent model of transduction in primate cone photoreceptors with measurements extracted from human cones using the paired-flash electroretinogram method. As a check, we also compare the predictions with previous single-cell measurements of ground squirrel cone responses.

Results: The predictions of the model provide a good description of the measurements, using values of parameters within the range previously determined for primate retina. The dim-flash response peaks in about 20 ms, and flash responses at all intensities are essentially monophasic. Three time constants in the model are extremely short: the two time constants for inactivation (of visual pigment and of transducin/phosphodiesterase) are around 3 and 10 ms, and the time constant for calcium equilibration lies in the same range.

Conclusion: The close correspondence between experiment and theory, using parameters previously derived for recordings from macaque retina, supports the notion that the electroretinogram approach and the modelling approach both provide an accurate estimate of the cone photoresponse in the living human eye. For reasons that remain unclear, the responses of isolated photoreceptors from the macaque retina, recorded previously using the suction pipette method, are considerably slower than found here, and display biphasic kinetics.

Citing Articles

Dyschromatopsia: a comprehensive analysis of mechanisms and cutting-edge treatments for color vision deficiency.

Yang Z, Yan L, Zhang W, Qi J, An W, Yao K Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1265630.

PMID: 38298913 PMC: 10828017. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1265630.


Assessment of digital light processing (DLP) projector stimulators for visual electrophysiology.

Marmoy O, Thompson D Doc Ophthalmol. 2023; 146(2):151-163.

PMID: 36617339 PMC: 10082110. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-022-09917-4.


Human cone elongation responses can be explained by photoactivated cone opsin and membrane swelling and osmotic response to phosphate produced by RGS9-catalyzed GTPase.

Pandiyan V, Nguyen P, Pugh Jr E, Sabesan R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(39):e2202485119.

PMID: 36122241 PMC: 9522364. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2202485119.


Revival of light signalling in the postmortem mouse and human retina.

Abbas F, Becker S, Jones B, Mure L, Panda S, Hanneken A Nature. 2022; 606(7913):351-357.

PMID: 35545677 PMC: 10000337. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04709-x.


Dark Adaptation and Its Role in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Nigalye A, Hess K, Pundlik S, Jeffrey B, Cukras C, Husain D J Clin Med. 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35268448 PMC: 8911214. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051358.


References
1.
van Hateren H . A cellular and molecular model of response kinetics and adaptation in primate cones and horizontal cells. J Vis. 2005; 5(4):331-47. DOI: 10.1167/5.4.5. View

2.
Tamura T, Nakatani K, Yau K . Calcium feedback and sensitivity regulation in primate rods. J Gen Physiol. 1991; 98(1):95-130. PMC: 2229042. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.98.1.95. View

3.
Nakatani K, Yau K . Calcium and magnesium fluxes across the plasma membrane of the toad rod outer segment. J Physiol. 1988; 395:695-729. PMC: 1192017. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp016942. View

4.
Pepperberg D, Birch D, Hood D . Photoresponses of human rods in vivo derived from paired-flash electroretinograms. Vis Neurosci. 1997; 14(1):73-82. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800008774. View

5.
Cideciyan A, Jacobson S, Gupta N, Osawa S, Locke K, Weiss E . Cone deactivation kinetics and GRK1/GRK7 expression in enhanced S cone syndrome caused by mutations in NR2E3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(3):1268-74. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0494. View