» Articles » PMID: 16624913

Estimating the Contribution of Mutation, Recombination and Gene Conversion in the Generation of Haplotypic Diversity

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2006 Apr 21
PMID 16624913
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recombination occurs through both homologous crossing over and homologous gene conversion during meiosis. The contribution of recombination relative to mutation is expected to be dramatically reduced in inbreeding organisms. We report coalescent-based estimates of the recombination parameter (rho) relative to estimates of the mutation parameter (theta) for 18 genes from the highly self-fertilizing grass, wild barley, Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum. Estimates of rho/theta are much greater than expected, with a mean rho/theta approximately 1.5, similar to estimates from outcrossing species. We also estimate rho with and without the contribution of gene conversion. Genotyping errors can mimic the effect of gene conversion, upwardly biasing estimates of the role of conversion. Thus we report a novel method for identifying genotyping errors in nucleotide sequence data sets. We show that there is evidence for gene conversion in many large nucleotide sequence data sets including our data that have been purged of all detectable sequencing errors and in data sets from Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, and Zea mays. In total, 13 of 27 loci show evidence of gene conversion. For these loci, gene conversion is estimated to contribute an average of twice as much as crossing over to total recombination.

Citing Articles

Rural populations facilitated early SARS-CoV-2 evolution and transmission in Missouri, USA.

Tang C, Li T, Haynes T, McElroy J, Ritter D, Hammer R Npj Viruses. 2024; 1.

PMID: 38186942 PMC: 10769004. DOI: 10.1038/s44298-023-00005-1.


Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes.

Graham N, Patil G, Bubeck D, Dobert R, Glenn K, Gutsche A Plant Physiol. 2020; 183(4):1453-1471.

PMID: 32457089 PMC: 7401131. DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.01194.


The Fate of Deleterious Variants in a Barley Genomic Prediction Population.

Kono T, Liu C, Vonderharr E, Koenig D, Fay J, Smith K Genetics. 2019; 213(4):1531-1544.

PMID: 31653677 PMC: 6893365. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302733.


The Role of Deleterious Substitutions in Crop Genomes.

Kono T, Fu F, Mohammadi M, Hoffman P, Liu C, Stupar R Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 33(9):2307-17.

PMID: 27301592 PMC: 4989107. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw102.


A Male-Specific Genetic Map of the Microcrustacean Daphnia pulex Based on Single-Sperm Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Xu S, Ackerman M, Long H, Bright L, Spitze K, Ramsdell J Genetics. 2015; 201(1):31-8.

PMID: 26116153 PMC: 4566271. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.179028.


References
1.
Watterson G . On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975; 7(2):256-76. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. View

2.
Ptak S, Voelpel K, Przeworski M . Insights into recombination from patterns of linkage disequilibrium in humans. Genetics. 2004; 167(1):387-97. PMC: 1470869. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.387. View

3.
Balakirev E, Chechetkin V, Lobzin V, Ayala F . DNA polymorphism in the beta-Esterase gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2003; 164(2):533-44. PMC: 1462603. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/164.2.533. View

4.
Copenhaver G, Housworth E, Stahl F . Crossover interference in Arabidopsis. Genetics. 2002; 160(4):1631-9. PMC: 1462055. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/160.4.1631. View

5.
Nordborg M, Hu T, Ishino Y, Jhaveri J, Toomajian C, Zheng H . The pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(7):e196. PMC: 1135296. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030196. View