» Articles » PMID: 16618500

Development of a Soft Tissue Seal Around Bone-anchored Transcutaneous Amputation Prostheses

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2006 Apr 19
PMID 16618500
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional amputation prosthetics are problematic because they rely on the stump-socket interface for attachment. Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prostheses (ITAP) could solve these problems; however they rely on the integrity of the soft tissue-implant interface as a barrier to exogenous agents, and in the prevention of downgrowth and marsupilisation. We have used an in vivo animal model to study the soft tissue interfaces around bone-anchored transcutaneous implants. We hypothesise that by facilitating and increasing the area of dermal attachment to the implant epithelial down-growth will be reduced. A flange with a series of 24, 0.7 mm holes positioned immediately below the epithelium was used to increase dermal attachment. This significantly reduced downgrowth and optimised the integrity of the collagenous tissue-implant interface at the dermal level. We postulate that the flange reduces relative interfacial movement at the epithelium-implant interface by providing increased surface area for dermal tissue attachment. A tight seal at the dermal tissue level reduces the degree of downgrowth around ITAP, eliminating marsupilisation as a potential failure modality. Surface topography and coatings did not affect the degree of downgrowth or dermal attachment to straight or flanged implants. A significant negative correlation was observed between downgrowth and both epithelial and dermal attachment. This study shows that a soft tissue-implant interface capable of preventing downgrowth and marsupilisation can develop around a bone-anchored transcutaneous implant, given the incorporation of a porous flange positioned in the dermal tissues immediately below the epithelium. This will benefit applications where bone-anchored transcutaneous implants are used.

Citing Articles

Basic science review of transcutaneous osseointegration: current status, research gaps and needs, and defining future directions.

Fearing B, Gitajn I, Romereim S, Hoellwarth J, Wenke J OTA Int. 2025; 8(1 Suppl):e367.

PMID: 40071166 PMC: 11892713. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000367.


Comparison In Vitro Study on the Interface between Skin and Bone Cell Cultures and Microporous Titanium Samples Manufactured with 3D Printing Technology Versus Sintered Samples.

Shevtsov M, Pitkin E, Combs S, Meulen G, Preucil C, Pitkin M Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39330641 PMC: 11434446. DOI: 10.3390/nano14181484.


The Impact of Ultrashort Pulse Laser Structuring of Metals on In-Vitro Cell Adhesion of Keratinocytes.

Staehlke S, Barth T, Muench M, Schroeter J, Wendlandt R, Oldorf P J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(2).

PMID: 38391887 PMC: 10889705. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15020034.


The safety of one-stage versus two-stage approach to osseointegrated prosthesis for limb amputation.

Banducci E, Al Muderis M, Lu W, Bested S Bone Jt Open. 2023; 4(7):539-550.

PMID: 37475711 PMC: 10359829. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2022-0117.R1.


Optimising soft tissue in-growth in additive layer manufactured osseointegrated transcutaneous implants.

Giusto E, Blunn G, Ferro de Godoy R, Liu C, Pendegrass C Biomater Transl. 2023; 3(4):243-249.

PMID: 36846509 PMC: 9947732. DOI: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.04.004.