» Articles » PMID: 16614263

Coronary Revascularisation in Women

Overview
Journal Heart
Date 2006 Apr 15
PMID 16614263
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in men and women worldwide. It is still considered a disease of men and there has been little recognition of its importance in women. Gender differences exist in acute and chronic ischaemia in terms of clinical manifestations, investigations and treatment. There are clear gender differences in coronary revascularisation with a higher mortality seen in women. At the time a woman presents with coronary artery disease she is older and has more co-morbid factors. Furthermore, women have smaller coronary arteries making them more difficult to revascularise. In recent years there has been a general trend towards improved outcomes in women undergoing both surgical and percutaneous coronary intervention. The increasing use of drug eluting stents and adjunctive medical treatment as well as the use of off-pump bypass surgery needs further evaluation in terms of gender differences. This article reviews the current literature on coronary revascularisation in women.

Citing Articles

Sex-based Differences in Complications Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Alasnag M, Masiero G, Biswas S, Haan I Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025; 27(1):33.

PMID: 39961890 DOI: 10.1007/s11883-025-01278-y.


Gender-Tailored Heart Team Decision Making Equalizes Outcomes for Female Patients after Aortic Valve Replacement through Right Anterior Small Thoracotomy (RAST).

Lavanchy I, Passos L, Aymard T, Grunenfelder J, Emmert M, Corti R J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39452299 PMC: 11508425. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11100329.


Sex-Specific Outcomes After Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy: A Patient-Level Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies.

Hussain Y, Kearney K, Abbott J, Kereiakes D, Di Mario C, Saito S J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 1(1):100011.

PMID: 39130137 PMC: 11307712. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2021.100011.


Interaction Between Treatment and Age or Sex in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Disease and Three-Vessel Disease.

Li T, Jiang L, Xu L, Tian J, Zhao X, Feng X Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:879834.

PMID: 35722116 PMC: 9200996. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.879834.


Interpreting angina: symptoms along a gender continuum.

Kreatsoulas C, Crea-Arsenio M, Shannon H, Velianou J, Giacomini M Open Heart. 2016; 3(1):e000376.

PMID: 27158523 PMC: 4854148. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000376.


References
1.
Casale P, Whitlow P, Franco I, Grigera F, Pashkow F, Topol E . Comparison of major complication rates with new atherectomy devices for percutaneous coronary intervention in women versus men. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 71(13):1221-3. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90650-2. View

2.
Keeley E, Boura J, Grines C . Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003; 361(9351):13-20. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7. View

3.
Weintraub W, Wenger N, Jones E, Craver J, Guyton R . Changing clinical characteristics of coronary surgery patients. Differences between men and women. Circulation. 1993; 88(5 Pt 2):II79-86. View

4.
Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, Jirasek K, Dvorak J, Votava J . One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Circulation. 2004; 110(22):3418-23. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148139.79580.36. View

5.
Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Bollwein H, Dibra A, Schuhlen H, Dirschinger J . Gender and restenosis after coronary artery stenting. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24(16):1523-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00320-8. View