The Clinical Impact of Histopathologic Response Assessment by Residual Tumor Cell Quantification in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The objectives of this study were to investigate histomorphologic features as a response classification after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RTx/CTx) and to correlate the results with clinical outcome parameters (e.g., postoperative morbidity and mortality, recurrence, and survival) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Methods: Three hundred eleven patients with histologically proven, locally advanced, intrathoracic ESCC (clinical T3 or T4, N0-N+, M0) located at or above the level of the tracheal bifurcation underwent preoperative, combined, simultaneous RTx/CTx followed by esophagectomy. Response to RTx/CTx was classified by the quantification of residual tumor cells. A histopathologic response was defined as <10% residual tumor cells found within the specimen compared with a histopathologic nonresponse, which was characterized by >10% residual tumor cells.
Results: A histopathologic response was correlated significantly with complete tumor resection status (R0 resection) (P .0001), histopathologic tumor (ypT) category (P <.0001), lymph node involvement (P <.0001), lymphatic vessel invasion (P <.001), and survival (P <.0001). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that histopathologic response classification according to the percentage of residual tumor cells was an independent prognostic factor (P <.0001). Nonresponders had greater postoperative pulmonary morbidity (P = .01), a greater 30-day mortality rate (P = .02), and a dismal survival rate compared to histopathologic responders (P <.0001).
Conclusions: Histopathologic response evaluation based on the quantification of residual tumor cells provided meaningful information for the assessment of outcomes among patients with ESCC who have underwent neoadjuvant RTx/CTx. The current results indicated that histopathologic responders may represent a subgroup of patients who benefit from neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.
Graf M, Ziegelmayer S, Reischl S, Teumer Y, Gassert F, Marka A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2.
PMID: 39857998 PMC: 11763438. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020216.
Emadi Torghabeh A, Aledavood S, Soltani E, Akbari Oryani M, Akhlaghi S, Hosseini S Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1439730.
PMID: 39224811 PMC: 11366607. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1439730.
Pao T, Chen Y, Chang W, Wu S, Lai W, Tseng Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0300173.
PMID: 38547184 PMC: 10977715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300173.
State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.
Withey S, Goh V, Foley K Br J Radiol. 2022; 95(1137):20220410.
PMID: 35671095 PMC: 10996959. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220410.
Jabbour T, Misyura M, Cowzer D, Zimmermann M, Rimkunas V, Marra A J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022; 114(5):761-770.
PMID: 35078243 PMC: 9086803. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac024.