» Articles » PMID: 16607143

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coeliac Serological Tests: a Prospective Study

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2006 Apr 12
PMID 16607143
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The best way to test serologically for coeliac disease (CD) remains controversial, with endomysial (EMA), transglutaminase (TTG), and gliadin antibodies (AGA) being assessed in various combinations with no apparent standardization. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether TTG-IgA+/-TTG-IgG could be used as a replacement for endomysial antibodies as a reliable screen for CD in patients presenting to a major Australian tertiary referral hospital for assessment of symptoms consistent with CD.

Methods: Individuals referred for gastroscopic assessment of possible CD were prospectively evaluated by duodenal biopsy assessment. The following diagnostic methods were compared: dual-isotype transglutaminase (TTG-dual), combined-isotype transglutaminase (TTG-IgA+G), TTG-IgA, combined-isotype gliadin antibodies (AGA-IgA+G), AGA-IgA, and endomysial antibody assays. Clinical performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve for receiver-operating characteristic analysis; AUROC) were assessed for all kits.

Results: The correlation between transglutaminase kits was generally good, with the best transglutaminase kit demonstrating high correlation (r=0.86) with endomysial antibodies. A comparison of different types of endomysial antibody assays displayed variable diagnostic performance (sensitivity 61.90-68.42%; specificity 80.00-98.57%; AUROC 0.71-0.83). Sensitivity (90.48-92.31%), specificity (80.77-82.89%) and AUROC values (0.92-0.94) for dual-isotype transglutaminase kits displayed narrow ranges. AGA assays were less sensitive (AGA-IgA: 42.31-46.15%; AGA-IgG: 61.54%) and less specific (AGA-IgA: 85.09-87.73%; AGA-IgG: 82.46-84.09%). Dual-isotype transglutaminase testing was diagnostically equivalent to transglutaminase-IgA (AUROC 0.92 versus 0.91, P=0.33).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that transglutaminase screening (using the IgA+/-IgG isotype) is a sensitive and specific alternative to endomysial antibody testing in the serological assessment of CD. On the basis of our findings, AGA antibody testing no longer appears to be an essential part of the diagnostic strategy for adult CD.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of positive coeliac disease serology and HLA risk genotypes in a multiethnic population of adults in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

Jamnik J, Villa C, Dhir S, Jenkins D, El-Sohemy A BMJ Open. 2024; 7(10):e017678.

PMID: 39272232 PMC: 5640059. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017678.


Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.

Elwenspoek M, Thom H, Sheppard A, Keeney E, ODonnell R, Jackson J Health Technol Assess. 2022; 26(44):1-310.

PMID: 36321689 PMC: 9638887. DOI: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.


Minimal Gluten Exposure Alters Urinary Volatile Organic Compounds in Stable Coeliac Disease.

McFarlane M, Arasaradnam R, Reed B, Daulton E, Wicaksono A, Tyagi H Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(3).

PMID: 35162037 PMC: 8839331. DOI: 10.3390/s22031290.


Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis.

Raiteri A, Granito A, Giamperoli A, Catenaro T, Negrini G, Tovoli F World J Gastroenterol. 2022; 28(1):154-175.

PMID: 35125825 PMC: 8793016. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.154.


Can High Titres of Anti Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies Reduce the Need for Intestinal Biopsy for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease?.

Bansal E, Kaur N, Mittal N Indian J Clin Biochem. 2018; 33(4):456-460.

PMID: 30319193 PMC: 6170233. DOI: 10.1007/s12291-017-0695-9.