» Articles » PMID: 16600007

Professionalizing Action Research--a Meaningful Strategy for Modernizing Services?

Overview
Journal J Nurs Manag
Specialty Nursing
Date 2006 Apr 8
PMID 16600007
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This paper outlines how a specific action research approach can be used to secure practice development in services which have found sustained change difficult. For the purpose of this paper discussion focuses upon using professionalizing action research (a form of action research) to secure transformation in acute inpatient mental health services. This speciality has experienced long-term difficultly in meaningful practice change. Not limited to this context parallels can be made with other health and social care services requiring significant modernization.

Aim: The aim is to critically discuss the use of professionalizing action research as an approach to sustainable change.

Discussion: clarifies whether this method is a suitable vehicle for change, which is ideally suited to services which have a poor record of practice development.

Method: A review of action research and practice development literature forms the basis of this paper. The literature is sourced through bulletin boards, electronic databases and the British Library Classification Scheme. Keywords searched are action research, team learning, managing change and practice development. Following definition; the components of professionalizing action research are analysed using the themes of educative base, problem focus, improvement and involvement.

Findings: The educative base of professionalizing action research is collaborative reflective practice which is used to initiate meaningful change, rooted in everyday practice. The benefit of this is that change actions are based in real-time situations. The problem focus component of professionalizing action research is used to emphasize the views of service users and carers. This is positive in terms of the patient and public involvement agenda although this theme does emphasize limitations of the approach. The final components are involvement and improvement, these are debated as pluralistic notions and the implications of this are acknowledged.

Conclusion: Reviewing the literature and theoretical application indicates the value of professionalizing action research as a process for modernization. The strength of the approach lies in the opportunity for team learning and change which is grounded in the context of services and pursued through collaboration.

Citing Articles

Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.

Merner B, Schonfeld L, Virgona A, Lowe D, Walsh L, Wardrope C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 3:CD013274.

PMID: 36917094 PMC: 10065807. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.


Protocol for a feasibility evaluation of a Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programme to improve resilience and academic achievement in refugee children from a community learning centre in Malaysia: PARSEL (Participatory Action Research on SEL).

Yap K, Koh A, Kumar A, Lahpai M, Cheng K, Ravindaran T PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273239.

PMID: 35980973 PMC: 9387805. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273239.


The Community Navigator Study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase community connections and reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.

Lloyd-Evans B, Bone J, Pinfold V, Lewis G, Billings J, Frerichs J Trials. 2017; 18(1):493.

PMID: 29061185 PMC: 5654042. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2226-7.


Introducing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to a physiotherapy-led pain rehabilitation programme: an Action Research study.

Barker K, Heelas L, Toye F Br J Pain. 2016; 10(1):22-8.

PMID: 27551408 PMC: 4977962. DOI: 10.1177/2049463715587117.


Evaluating the effectiveness of care integration strategies in different healthcare systems in Latin America: the EQUITY-LA II quasi-experimental study protocol.

Vazquez M, Vargas I, Unger J, De Paepe P, Mogollon-Perez A, Samico I BMJ Open. 2015; 5(7):e007037.

PMID: 26231753 PMC: 4521516. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007037.