» Articles » PMID: 16597328

Biphasic Responses of the Brachial Artery Diameter Following Forearm Occlusion: a Blunted Response in the Elderly

Overview
Journal Dyn Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2006 Apr 7
PMID 16597328
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose was to examine the temporal response of the brachial artery diameter following 5 minutes of forearm occlusion in young men. A secondary objective was to compare the main features of the temporal pattern between young and old.

Methods: Sixteen young (28 +/- 8 yrs) and fifteen older (85 +/- 8 yrs) men underwent high-resolution ultrasonography of the brachial artery before and after five minutes of forearm occlusion.

Results: Following release of the pressure cuff the brachial artery diameter exhibits a temporal biphasic response. Initially, there is a significant reduction in brachial diameter (NIL) compared to baseline (BASE), followed by a rapid increase to a PEAK at 41 sec post release. When comparing the magnitude of the decrease in diameter and the Brachial Artery Flow Mediated Dilation (BAFMD) between Young and Old, older subjects demonstrated a blunted response (Magnitude of Decrease: Young: 2.0%; Old: 0.4%, p = 0.015, and BAFMD: Young: 7.7%; Old: 2.3%, p = 0.001). Finally, a significant relationship was noted between the magnitude of decrease and BAFMD (r = -0.44, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Examination of the temporal response of the brachial artery diameter following 5 minutes of forearm occlusion reveals a biphasic pattern in all participants. Specific features of this pattern are blunted in older adults compared with younger subjects. Finally, the magnitude of the drop in diameter following forearm occlusion correlates with the magnitude of the BAFMD.

Citing Articles

Total brachial artery reactivity and first time incident coronary heart disease events in a longitudinal cohort study: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Polak J, Ouyang P, Vaidya D PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0211726.

PMID: 30969969 PMC: 6457482. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211726.


High-flow-mediated constriction in adults is not influenced by biomarkers of cardiovascular and metabolic risk.

Ostrem J, Evanoff N, Ryder J, Steinberger J, Sinaiko A, Bisch K J Clin Ultrasound. 2016; 45(1):35-42.

PMID: 27492803 PMC: 5159190. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22387.


Comparison of brachial artery vasoreactivity in elite power athletes and age-matched controls.

Welsch M, Blalock P, Credeur D, Parish T PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e54718.

PMID: 23359214 PMC: 3554649. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054718.


Redox balance in the aging microcirculation: new friends, new foes, and new clinical directions.

Muller-Delp J, Gurovich A, Christou D, Leeuwenburgh C Microcirculation. 2011; 19(1):19-28.

PMID: 21954960 PMC: 6319627. DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2011.00139.x.


Effects of handgrip training with venous restriction on brachial artery vasodilation.

Credeur D, Hollis B, Welsch M Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 42(7):1296-302.

PMID: 20019641 PMC: 2903220. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ca7b06.

References
1.
Laurent S, Lacolley P, Brunel P, Laloux B, Pannier B, Safar M . Flow-dependent vasodilation of brachial artery in essential hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258(4 Pt 2):H1004-11. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1990.258.4.H1004. View

2.
Brandes R, Fleming I, Busse R . Endothelial aging. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 66(2):286-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.12.027. View

3.
Taddei S, Virdis A, Mattei P, Ghiadoni L, Gennari A, Fasolo C . Aging and endothelial function in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension. Circulation. 1995; 91(7):1981-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1981. View

4.
Celermajer D, Sorensen K, Bull C, Robinson J, Deanfield J . Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors and their interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24(6):1468-74. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90141-4. View

5.
FOLKOW B, Svanborg A . Physiology of cardiovascular aging. Physiol Rev. 1993; 73(4):725-64. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.4.725. View