Comparison of Laser-assisted Hatching and Acidified Tyrode's Hatching by Evaluation of Blastocyst Development Rates in Sibling Embryos: a Prospective Randomized Trial
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To assess two zona drilling methods in terms of blastocyst development rates using sister embryos.
Design: Prospective, randomized study. Sister embryos of 14 patients were randomly assigned on day 3 to acidified Tyrode's zona drilling or to laser zona drilling. After biopsy, subsequent embryo culture until the blastocyst stage (day 5) was performed.
Setting: Private fertility center.
Patient(s): Patients undergoing IVF-preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Intervention(s): Embryo biopsy using either laser-assisted hatching or acidified Tyrode's hatching on sibling embryos and subsequent blastocyst development evaluation.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Evaluation of blastocyst development in terms of degree of expansion and cell number in the inner cell mass and trophectoderm.
Result(s): Blastocyst development rates (and blastocyst quality) were similarly high in both the acidified Tyrode's hatching group and the laser-assisted hatching group.
Conclusion(s): Laser hatching does not impair embryonic development to the blastocyst stage, demonstrating that laser-assisted hatching is a suitable alternative to the use of acidified Tyrode's solution for zona drilling.
Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review.
Aoyama N, Kato K Reprod Med Biol. 2020; 19(3):222-231.
PMID: 32684821 PMC: 7360970. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12318.
A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy.
Cedillo L, Ocampo-Barcenas A, Maldonado I, Valdez-Morales F, Camargo F, Lopez-Bayghen E Fertil Res Pract. 2017; 2:13.
PMID: 28620540 PMC: 5424395. DOI: 10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4.
Padula F, Capriglione S, Iaconianni P, Gatti S, Lippa A, Minutolo S Lasers Med Sci. 2017; 32(7):1663-1666.
PMID: 28547074 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2242-6.
Rodriguez-Purata J, Gingold J, Lee J, Whitehouse M, Slifkin R, Briton-Jones C Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(11):2458-2470.
PMID: 27619770 PMC: 6296335. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew205.
Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi F, Scarica C, Palagiano A, Canipari R Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:7193075.
PMID: 26942198 PMC: 4749789. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7193075.