» Articles » PMID: 16586442

Morphoregulation of Avian Beaks: Comparative Mapping of Growth Zone Activities and Morphological Evolution

Overview
Journal Dev Dyn
Publisher Wiley
Date 2006 Apr 6
PMID 16586442
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Avian beak diversity is a classic example of morphological evolution. Recently, we showed that localized cell proliferation mediated by bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) can explain the different shapes of chicken and duck beaks (Wu et al. [2004] Science 305:1465). Here, we compare further growth activities among chicken (conical and slightly curved), duck (straight and long), and cockatiel (highly curved) developing beak primordia. We found differential growth activities among different facial prominences and within one prominence. The duck has a wider frontal nasal mass (FNM), and more sustained fibroblast growth factor 8 activity. The cockatiel has a thicker FNM that grows more vertically and a relatively reduced mandibular prominence. In each prominence the number, size, and position of localized growth zones can vary: it is positioned more rostrally in the duck and more posteriorly in the cockatiel FNM, correlating with beak curvature. BMP4 is enriched in these localized growth zones. When BMP activity is experimentally altered in all prominences, beak size was enlarged or reduced proportionally. When only specific prominences were altered, the prototypic conical shaped chicken beaks were converted into an array of beak shapes mimicking those in nature. These results suggest that the size of beaks can be modulated by the overall activity of the BMP pathway, which mediates the growth. The shape of the beaks can be fine-tuned by localized BMP activity, which mediates the range, level, and duration of locally enhanced growth. Implications of topobiology vs. molecular blueprint concepts in the Evo-Devo of avian beak forms are discussed.

Citing Articles

Morphogens in the evolution of size, shape and patterning.

Mosby L, Bowen A, Hadjivasiliou Z Development. 2024; 151(18).

PMID: 39302048 PMC: 7616732. DOI: 10.1242/dev.202412.


Cellular, Molecular, and Genetic Mechanisms of Avian Beak Development and Evolution.

Schneider R Annu Rev Genet. 2024; 58(1):433-454.

PMID: 39227135 PMC: 11777486. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-111523-101929.


FInCH: FIJI plugin for automated and scalable whole-image analysis of protein expression and cell morphology.

Lee C, Sanchez Moreno C, Badyaev A MethodsX. 2024; 13:102855.

PMID: 39105087 PMC: 11299569. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102855.


Conserved physical mechanisms of cell and tissue elongation.

Boutillon A, Banavar S, Campas O Development. 2024; 151(10).

PMID: 38767601 PMC: 11190436. DOI: 10.1242/dev.202687.


Beakiation: how a novel parrot gait expands the locomotor repertoire of living birds.

Dickinson E, Young M, Granatosky M R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):231397.

PMID: 38298389 PMC: 10827422. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231397.


References
1.
Robledo R, Rajan L, Li X, Lufkin T . The Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes are essential for craniofacial, axial, and appendicular skeletal development. Genes Dev. 2002; 16(9):1089-101. PMC: 186247. DOI: 10.1101/gad.988402. View

2.
Richman J, Lee S . About face: signals and genes controlling jaw patterning and identity in vertebrates. Bioessays. 2003; 25(6):554-68. DOI: 10.1002/bies.10288. View

3.
Hamburger V, HAMILTON H . A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol. 2014; 88(1):49-92. View

4.
Hu D, Marcucio R, Helms J . A zone of frontonasal ectoderm regulates patterning and growth in the face. Development. 2003; 130(9):1749-58. DOI: 10.1242/dev.00397. View

5.
Bontoux M, Teillet M, Le Douarin N . Heterogeneity in the development of the vertebra. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(22):10435-9. PMC: 45035. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10435. View