» Articles » PMID: 16586084

Mechanical Reconfiguration Mediates Swallowing and Rejection in Aplysia Californica

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Apr 6
PMID 16586084
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Muscular hydrostats, such as tongues, trunks or tentacles, have fewer constraints on their degrees of freedom than musculoskeletal systems, so changes in a structure's shape may alter the positions and lengths of other components (i.e., induce mechanical reconfiguration). We studied mechanical reconfiguration during rejection and swallowing in the marine mollusk Aplysia californica. During rejection, inedible material is pushed out of an animal's buccal cavity. The grasper (radula/odontophore) closes on inedible material, and then a posterior muscle, I2, pushes the grasper toward the jaws (protracts it). After the material is released, an anterior muscle complex (the I1/I3/jaw complex) pushes the grasper toward the esophagus (retracts it). During swallowing, the grasper is protracted open, and then retracts closed, pulling in food. Grasper closure changes its shape. Magnetic resonance images show that grasper closure lengthens I2. A kinetic model quantified the changes in the ability of I2 and I1/I3 to exert force as grasper shape changed. Grasper closure increases I2's ability to protract during rejection, and increases I1/I3's ability to retract during swallowing. Motor neurons controlling radular closure may therefore affect the behavioral outputs of I2's and I1/I3's motor neurons. Thus, motor neurons may modulate the outputs of other motor neurons through mechanical reconfiguration.

Citing Articles

Full Hill-type muscle model of the I1/I3 retractor muscle complex in Aplysia californica.

Sukhnandan R, Chen Q, Shen J, Pao S, Huan Y, Sutton G Biol Cybern. 2024; 118(3-4):165-185.

PMID: 38922432 PMC: 11289039. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-024-00990-3.


A computational neural model that incorporates both intrinsic dynamics and sensory feedback in the Aplysia feeding network.

Li Y, Webster-Wood V, Gill J, Sutton G, Chiel H, Quinn R Biol Cybern. 2024; 118(3-4):187-213.

PMID: 38769189 PMC: 11289348. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-024-00991-2.


Scaling of buccal mass growth and muscle activation determine the duration of feeding behaviours in the marine mollusc Aplysia californica.

Rogers S, Gill J, Skalski De Campos A, Wang K, Kaza I, Fan V J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(8).

PMID: 38584490 PMC: 11058693. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246551.


Variational and phase response analysis for limit cycles with hard boundaries, with applications to neuromechanical control problems.

Wang Y, Gill J, Chiel H, Thomas P Biol Cybern. 2022; 116(5-6):687-710.

PMID: 36396795 PMC: 9691512. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-022-00951-8.


Dynamical consequences of sensory feedback in a half-center oscillator coupled to a simple motor system.

Yu Z, Thomas P Biol Cybern. 2021; 115(2):135-160.

PMID: 33656573 PMC: 8510507. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-021-00864-y.


References
1.
Sutton G, Macknin J, Gartman S, Sunny G, Beer R, Crago P . Passive hinge forces in the feeding apparatus of Aplysia aid retraction during biting but not during swallowing. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004; 190(6):501-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-004-0517-4. View

2.
Scheepens W, Jongen M, Nieman F, de Bie R, Weil E, van Kerrebroeck P . Predictive factors for sacral neuromodulation in chronic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Urology. 2002; 60(4):598-602. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01841-1. View

3.
Kupfermann I . Feeding behavior in Aplysia: a simple system for the study of motivation. Behav Biol. 1974; 10(1):1-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(74)91644-7. View

4.
Church P, COHEN K, Scott M, Kirk M . Peptidergic motoneurons in the buccal ganglia of Aplysia californica: immunocytochemical, morphological, and physiological characterizations. J Comp Physiol A. 1991; 168(3):323-36. DOI: 10.1007/BF00198352. View

5.
Rosen S, Miller M, Cropper E, Kupfermann I . Outputs of radula mechanoafferent neurons in Aplysia are modulated by motor neurons, interneurons, and sensory neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 83(3):1621-36. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.3.1621. View