» Articles » PMID: 16585529

Experimental Evidence for Interspecific Directional Selection on Moth Pheromone Communication

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2006 Apr 6
PMID 16585529
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The chemical composition of the sexual communication signals of female moths is thought to be under strong stabilizing selection, because females that produce atypical pheromone blends suffer lower success in finding mates. This intraspecific selection pressure cannot explain the high diversity of moth pheromone blends found in nature. We conducted experiments to determine whether communication interference from males of closely related species could exert strong enough directional selection to cause evolution of these signals. Attraction and mating success of Heliothis subflexa (Hs) females with a normal quantitative trait locus for production of acetate pheromone components (norm-OAc) were compared with Hs females with an introgressed quantitative trait locus from Heliothis virescens (Hv) that dramatically decreased the amount of acetate esters in their pheromone glands (low-OAc). In field experiments with natural Hv and Hs populations, 10 times more Hv males were captured in traps baited with live low-OAc Hs females than in traps with norm-OAc Hs females. This pattern was confirmed in mate-choice assays in cages. Hybrids resulting from Hv-Hs matings have effectively zero fitness in the field. Combining our results with the extensive data set gathered in the past 40 years on the reproductive biology of Hv, we can quantitatively estimate that the directional selection exerted by Hv males on Hs females to produce relatively high amounts (>5%) of acetates can range from 0.135 to 0.231. Such intense interspecific selection may counteract intraspecific stabilizing selection that impedes evolutionary changes in pheromone blends and could lead to diversification of sexual signals.

Citing Articles

Ecological immunology: do sexual attraction and immunity trade-off through a desaturase?.

Gao K, van der Heide W, Muijderman D, Nichols S, Karwal C, Kuperus P Insect Sci. 2024; 32(1):290-300.

PMID: 38769890 PMC: 11824886. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.13379.


Lipases and carboxylesterases affect moth sex pheromone compounds involved in interspecific mate recognition.

de Fouchier A, Fruitet E, Lievers R, Kuperus P, Emerson J, Gould F Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7505.

PMID: 37980401 PMC: 10657362. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43100-w.


Evolutionary shifts in pheromone receptors contribute to speciation in four Helicoverpa species.

Cao S, Shi C, Wang B, Xiu P, Wang Y, Liu Y Cell Mol Life Sci. 2023; 80(8):199.

PMID: 37421463 PMC: 11072504. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-023-04837-1.


The paradox behind the pattern of rapid adaptive radiation: how can the speciation process sustain itself through an early burst?.

Martin C, Richards E Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2022; 50(1):569-593.

PMID: 36237480 PMC: 9555815. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062443.


Experimental evolution of a pheromone signal.

Blankers T, Fruitet E, Burdfield-Steel E, Groot A Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(5):e8941.

PMID: 35646318 PMC: 9130292. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8941.


References
1.
Noor M . GENETICS OF SEXUAL ISOLATION AND COURTSHIP DYSFUNCTION IN MALE HYBRIDS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS. Evolution. 2017; 51(3):809-815. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03663.x. View

2.
Ortiz-Barrientos D, Noor M . Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus. Science. 2005; 310(5753):1467. DOI: 10.1126/science.1121260. View

3.
Vetter R, Baker T . Behavioral responses of maleHeliothis virescens in a sustained-flight tunnel to combinations of seven compounds identified from female sex pheromone glands. J Chem Ecol. 2014; 9(6):747-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF00988780. View

4.
Shaw K, Parsons Y . Divergence of mate recognition behavior and its consequences for genetic architectures of speciation. Am Nat. 2008; 159 Suppl 3:S61-75. DOI: 10.1086/338373. View

5.
Gries G, Schaefer P, Gries R, Liska J, Gotoh T . Reproductive character displacement in Lymantria monacha from northern Japan?. J Chem Ecol. 2001; 27(6):1163-76. DOI: 10.1023/a:1010316029165. View