» Articles » PMID: 16574878

Assent in Paediatric Research: Theoretical and Practical Considerations

Overview
Journal J Med Ethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2006 Apr 1
PMID 16574878
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Guidelines around the world require children to provide assent for their participation in most research studies. Yet, little further guidance is provided on how review committees should implement this requirement, including which children are capable of providing assent and when the requirement for assent may be waived on the grounds that the research offers participating children the potential for important clinical benefit. The present paper argues that the assent requirement is supported by the importance of allowing children who are capable to make their own decisions. This suggests children are capable of assent when they become able to understand the research in question. While development varies across individual children, existing data suggest most children develop this ability by approximately age 14. Until instruments are developed to assess the assent capacity of individual children, this age should be used as the threshold for assent. In addition, the importance of protecting children from harm suggests that the sustained dissent of all children, including those who are unable to provide assent, should be respected. While the assent requirement may be waived when research participation offers the potential for important medical benefit that is unavailable outside the research context, analysis suggests that children's sustained dissent should be respected in all cases.

Citing Articles

Mature Minor Doctrine Clarification Act: A Setback in Pediatric Immunizations.

Hijano D, Yaun J J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2024; 13(2):155-158.

PMID: 38306461 PMC: 10896253. DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piae006.


Evaluating the Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent of Transition age Children to Adolescents in Human Subject Research.

Salayev K, Aslanova U, Munir K J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023; 19(1-2):28-36.

PMID: 38073174 PMC: 10957319. DOI: 10.1177/15562646231219384.


Ethical and practical considerations related to data sharing when collecting patient-reported outcomes in care-based child health research.

Vanderhout S, Potter B, Smith M, Butcher N, Vaters J, Chakraborty P Qual Life Res. 2023; 32(8):2319-2328.

PMID: 37002464 PMC: 10329050. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03393-2.


The Depiction of Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making by Children and Adolescents in Medical Television.

Golden M, Ekpa N, Rafferty B, Olympia R Cureus. 2022; 14(5):e24662.

PMID: 35663707 PMC: 9158253. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24662.


Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials.

Afolabi M, Kelly L J Med Ethics. 2021; 48(11):825-831.

PMID: 34362828 PMC: 9626916. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107263.


References
1.
Leikin S . Minors' assent, consent, or dissent to medical research. IRB. 1993; 15(2):1-7. View

2.
Kodish E . Informed consent for pediatric research: is it really possible?. J Pediatr. 2003; 142(2):89-90. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2003.64. View

3.
. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Bull Med Ethics. 2004; (182):17-23. View

4.
Broome M, Kodish E, Geller G, Siminoff L . Children in research: new perspectives and practices for informed consent. IRB. 2004; Suppl 25(5):S20-S23. View

5.
Smyth R . Research with children. Paediatric practice needs better evidence--gained in collaboration with parents and children. BMJ. 2001; 322(7299):1377-8. PMC: 1120459. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1377. View