» Articles » PMID: 16571641

Similar Ovulation Rates, but Different Follicular Development with Highly Purified Menotrophin Compared with Recombinant FSH in WHO Group II Anovulatory Infertility: a Randomized Controlled Study

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2006 Mar 31
PMID 16571641
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The contribution of the LH activity in menotrophin preparations for ovulation induction has been investigated in small trials conducted versus FSH preparations. The objective of this study was to demonstrate non-inferiority of highly purified urinary menotrophin (HP-HMG) versus recombinant FSH (rFSH) with respect to the primary outcome measure, ovulation rate.

Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, assessor-blind, multinational study. Women with anovulatory infertility WHO Group II and resistant to clomiphene citrate were randomized (computer-generated list) to stimulation with HP-HMG (n=91) or rFSH (n=93) using a low-dose step-up protocol.

Results: The ovulation rate was 85.7% with HP-HMG and 85.5% with rFSH (per-protocol population), and non-inferiority was demonstrated. Significantly fewer intermediate-sized follicles were observed in the HP-HMG group (P<0.05). The singleton live birth rate was comparable between the two groups. The frequency of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and/or cancellation due to excessive response was 2.2% with HP-HMG and 9.8% with rFSH (P=0.058).

Conclusions: Stimulation with HP-HMG is associated with ovulation rates at least as good as a rFSH in anovulatory WHO Group II women. LH activity modifies follicular development so that fewer intermediate-sized follicles develop. This could have a positive impact on the safety of ovulation induction protocols.

Citing Articles

Highly purified-hMG versus rFSH in ovarian hyperstimulation in women undergoing elective fertility preservation: a retrospective cohort study.

Israeli T, Samara N, Barda S, Groutz A, Azem F, Amir H JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025; 29(1):136-144.

PMID: 39835796 PMC: 11867238. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240099.


Patients with low prognosis in ART: a Delphi consensus to identify potential clinical implications and measure the impact of POSEIDON criteria.

Alviggi C, Humaidan P, Fischer R, Conforti A, Dahan M, La Marca A Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):122.

PMID: 39385174 PMC: 11465546. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01291-x.


Significance of serum AMH and antral follicle count discrepancy for the prediction of ovarian stimulation response in Poseidon criteria patients.

Hochberg A, Dahan M, Yarali H, Vuong L, Esteves S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(3):717-726.

PMID: 38358433 PMC: 10957796. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03050-8.


The therapeutic effects of rFSH versus uFSH/uHMG on ovarian stimulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yu Y, Zhang Q, Sun K, Xiu Y, Wang X, Wang K Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 309(6):2529-2555.

PMID: 37470817 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07095-5.


Novel Physiology and Definition of Poor Ovarian Response; Clinical Recommendations.

Abu-Musa A, Haahr T, Humaidan P Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(6).

PMID: 32204404 PMC: 7139860. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21062110.