» Articles » PMID: 16547109

Strong Regional Heterogeneity in Base Composition Evolution on the Drosophila X Chromosome

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2006 Mar 21
PMID 16547109
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fluctuations in base composition appear to be prevalent in Drosophila and mammal genome evolution, but their timescale, genomic breadth, and causes remain obscure. Here, we study base composition evolution within the X chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster and five of its close relatives. Substitutions were inferred on six extant and two ancestral lineages for 14 near-telomeric and 9 nontelomeric genes. GC content evolution is highly variable both within the genome and within the phylogenetic tree. In the lineages leading to D. yakuba and D. orena, GC content at silent sites has increased rapidly near telomeres, but has decreased in more proximal (nontelomeric) regions. D. orena shows a 17-fold excess of GC-increasing vs. AT-increasing synonymous changes within a small (approximately 130-kb) region close to the telomeric end. Base composition changes within introns are consistent with changes in mutation patterns, but stronger GC elevation at synonymous sites suggests contributions of natural selection or biased gene conversion. The Drosophila yakuba lineage shows a less extreme elevation of GC content distributed over a wider genetic region (approximately 1.2 Mb). A lack of change in GC content for most introns within this region suggests a role of natural selection in localized base composition fluctuations.

Citing Articles

Locus-specific decoupling of base composition evolution at synonymous sites and introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia lineages.

Bauer DuMont V, Singh N, Wright M, Aquadro C Genome Biol Evol. 2010; 1:67-74.

PMID: 20333178 PMC: 2817403. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evp008.


Nonallelic gene conversion in the genus Drosophila.

Casola C, Ganote C, Hahn M Genetics. 2010; 185(1):95-103.

PMID: 20215470 PMC: 2870979. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.115444.


Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Singh N, Arndt P, Clark A, Aquadro C Mol Biol Evol. 2009; 26(7):1591-605.

PMID: 19351792 PMC: 2734147. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp071.


African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans populations have similar levels of sequence variability, suggesting comparable effective population sizes.

Nolte V, Schlotterer C Genetics. 2008; 178(1):405-12.

PMID: 18202383 PMC: 2206089. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.080200.


Global patterns of sequence evolution in Drosophila.

Gallach M, Arnau V, Marin I BMC Genomics. 2007; 8:408.

PMID: 17996078 PMC: 2180185. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-408.


References
1.
Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T . Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985; 22(2):160-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF02101694. View

2.
Casacuberta E, Pardue M . Transposon telomeres are widely distributed in the Drosophila genus: TART elements in the virilis group. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(6):3363-8. PMC: 152298. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0230353100. View

3.
Wolfe K, Sharp P, Li W . Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature. 1989; 337(6204):283-5. DOI: 10.1038/337283a0. View

4.
Danilevskaya O, Tan C, Wong J, Alibhai M, Pardue M . Unusual features of the Drosophila melanogaster telomere transposable element HeT-A are conserved in Drosophila yakuba telomere elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(7):3770-5. PMC: 19912. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3770. View

5.
Wootton J, Federhen S . Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases. Methods Enzymol. 1996; 266:554-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)66035-2. View