» Articles » PMID: 16544075

Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Timing Does Not Influence Conversion Rate

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Mar 18
PMID 16544075
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment of acute cholecystitis is urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Most reports suggest that a delay of 72 or 96 h from onset of symptoms leads to a higher conversion rate. This study assessed the conversion rate in relation to the timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Methods: During a 12 month period, 112 patients received laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care university hospital in central Taiwan. Data were collected prospectively.

Results: The overall conversion rate was 3.6% (4/112). Of 62 procedures performed within 72 h from onset of symptoms, 2 were converted, as compared with 2 of 50 procedures after 72 h. Of 76 procedures performed within 96 h from onset of symptoms, 3 were converted, as compared with 1 of 36 procedures after 96 h. There were no mortalities or common bile duct injuries.

Conclusions: The conversion rate for urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy among patients with acute cholecystitis can be as low as 3.6%. The timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy has no impact on the conversion rate.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: comparison of results between early and late cholecystectomy.

Acar T, Kamer E, Acar N, Atahan K, Bag H, Haciyanli M Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 26:49.

PMID: 28451027 PMC: 5398876. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.49.8359.


Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Cao A, Eslick G, Cox M Surg Endosc. 2015; 30(3):1172-82.

PMID: 26139487 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4325-4.


Evaluation of affecting factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

Oymaci E, Ucar A, Aydogan S, Sari E, Erkan N, Yildirim M Prz Gastroenterol. 2015; 9(6):336-41.

PMID: 25653728 PMC: 4300343. DOI: 10.5114/pg.2014.45491.


Determination of optimal operation time for the management of acute cholecystitis: a clinical trial.

Oymaci E, Ucar A, Yakan S, Carti E, Coskun A, Erkan N Prz Gastroenterol. 2014; 9(3):147-52.

PMID: 25097711 PMC: 4110361. DOI: 10.5114/pg.2014.43576.


Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Johner A, Raymakers A, Wiseman S Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(1):256-62.

PMID: 22773234 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2430-1.


References
1.
Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Ueno M, Yamaue H . Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004; 51(56):346-8. View

2.
Navez B, Mutter D, Russier Y, Vix M, Jamali F, Lipski D . Safety of laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 609 cases. World J Surg. 2001; 25(10):1352-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0122-4. View

3.
Koo K, Thirlby R . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. What is the optimal timing for operation?. Arch Surg. 1996; 131(5):540-4; discussion 544-5. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430170086016. View

4.
Glavic Z, Begic L, Simlesa D, Rukavina A . Treatment of acute cholecystitis. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15(4):398-401. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000333. View

5.
Pessaux P, Tuech J, Rouge C, DUPLESSIS R, Cervi C, Arnaud J . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. A prospective comparative study in patients with acute vs. chronic cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14(4):358-61. DOI: 10.1007/s004640020088. View