» Articles » PMID: 16537393

Molecular Basis for the Preferential Cleft Recognition by Dromedary Heavy-chain Antibodies

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2006 Mar 16
PMID 16537393
Citations 286
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clefts on protein surfaces are avoided by antigen-combining sites of conventional antibodies, in contrast to heavy-chain antibodies (HCAbs) of camelids that seem to be attracted by enzymes' substrate pockets. The explanation for this pronounced preference of HCAbs was investigated. Eight single domain antigen-binding fragments of HCAbs (VHH) with nanomolar affinities for lysozyme were isolated from three immunized dromedaries. Six of eight VHHs compete with small lysozyme inhibitors. This ratio of active site binders is also found within the VHH pool derived from polyclonal HCAbs purified from the serum of the immunized dromedary. The crystal structures of six VHHs in complex with lysozyme and their interaction surfaces were compared to those of conventional antibodies with the same antigen. The interface sizes of VHH and conventional antibodies to lysozyme are very similar as well as the number and chemical nature of the contacts. The main difference comes from the compact prolate shape of VHH that presents a large convex paratope, predominantly formed by the H3 loop and interacting, although with different structures, into the concave lysozyme substrate-binding pocket. Therefore, a single domain antigen-combining site has a clear structural advantage over a conventional dimeric format for targeting clefts on antigenic surfaces.

Citing Articles

FASTIA: A rapid and accessible platform for protein variant interaction analysis demonstrated with a single-domain antibody.

Matsunaga R, Tsumoto K Protein Sci. 2025; 34(3):e70065.

PMID: 39981938 PMC: 11843469. DOI: 10.1002/pro.70065.


Development of a nanobody-based competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the sensitive detection of antibodies against porcine deltacoronavirus.

Yu R, Zhang L, Bai Y, Zhou P, Yang J, Wang D J Clin Microbiol. 2025; 63(3):e0161524.

PMID: 39950715 PMC: 11898664. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01615-24.


Unveiling the new chapter in nanobody engineering: advances in traditional construction and AI-driven optimization.

Liu J, Wu L, Xie A, Liu W, He Z, Wan Y J Nanobiotechnology. 2025; 23(1):87.

PMID: 39915791 PMC: 11800653. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03169-5.


Influenza A Virus H7 nanobody recognizes a conserved immunodominant epitope on hemagglutinin head and confers heterosubtypic protection.

Chen Z, Huang H, Wang X, Schon K, Jia Y, Lebens M Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):432.

PMID: 39788944 PMC: 11718266. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55193-y.


Heat-sterilizable antibody mimics designed on the cold shock protein scaffold from hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima.

Amesaka H, Tachibana M, Hara M, Toya S, Nakagawa H, Matsumura H Protein Sci. 2024; 34(1):e70018.

PMID: 39724358 PMC: 11670304. DOI: 10.1002/pro.70018.


References
1.
Cauerhff A, Goldbaum F, Braden B . Structural mechanism for affinity maturation of an anti-lysozyme antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(10):3539-44. PMC: 373498. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400060101. View

2.
Irwin D . Evolution of the bovine lysozyme gene family: changes in gene expression and reversion of function. J Mol Evol. 1995; 41(3):299-312. View

3.
Decanniere K, Desmyter A, Lauwereys M, Ghahroudi M, Muyldermans S, Wyns L . A single-domain antibody fragment in complex with RNase A: non-canonical loop structures and nanomolar affinity using two CDR loops. Structure. 1999; 7(4):361-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80049-5. View

4.
Brunger A, Adams P, Clore G, DeLano W, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve R . Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998; 54(Pt 5):905-21. DOI: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. View

5.
Ay J, Keitel T, Kuttner G, Wessner H, Scholz C, Hahn M . Crystal structure of a phage library-derived single-chain Fv fragment complexed with turkey egg-white lysozyme at 2.0 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 2000; 301(2):239-46. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3971. View