Home Blood Pressure Self-monitoring: Diagnostic Performance in White-coat Hypertension
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To determine the diagnostic performance of home blood pressure self-monitoring in white-coat hypertension using a 3-day reading program.
Material And Methods: One hundred and ninety nontreated patients recently diagnosed with mild-moderate hypertension, selected consecutively at four primary healthcare centers in the city of Barcelona, were included. Each patient underwent morning and night home blood pressure self-monitoring with readings in triplicate for three consecutive days, followed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The normality cut-off point value for home blood pressure self-monitoring and daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was 135/85 mmHg.
Results: Sixty-three patients were diagnosed with white-coat hypertension with home blood pressure self-monitoring (34.8%; 95% confidence interval: 27.9-42.2) and 74 with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (41.6%; 95% confidence interval: 33.7-48.4). No statistically significant differences were observed between home blood pressure self-monitoring values and those of diurnal ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [137.4 (14.3)/82.1 (8.3) mmHg vs. 134.8 (11.3)/81.3 (9.5) mmHg]. Home blood pressure self-monitoring diagnostic performance parameters were sensitivity 50.0% (95% confidence interval: 38.3-61.7), specificity 75.7% (95% confidence interval: 66.3-83.2), positive and negative predictive values 58.7% (95% confidence interval: 45.6-70.8) and 68.6% (95% confidence interval: 59.4-76.7), respectively, and positive and negative probability coefficients 2.05 and 0.66, respectively. Analysis of different normality cut-off points using a receiver operating characteristic curve failed to produce significant improvement in the diagnostic performance of home blood pressure self-monitoring.
Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of a 3-day home blood pressure self-monitoring reading program in white-coat hypertension was poor. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring continues to be the test of choice for this indication.
Glenn T, Eaton C, Psoter K, Eakin M, Pruette C, Riekert K Pediatr Nephrol. 2022; 37(10):2405-2413.
PMID: 35166919 PMC: 9376201. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05479-4.
Constanti M, Boffa R, Floyd C, Wierzbicki A, McManus R, Glover M J Hum Hypertens. 2020; 35(5):455-461.
PMID: 32461579 PMC: 8134050. DOI: 10.1038/s41371-020-0357-x.
Practical Aspects of Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Peixoto A Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016; 11(4):214-8.
PMID: 27057289 PMC: 4814006. DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-11-4-214.
Home blood pressure monitoring: primary role in hypertension management.
Stergiou G, Kollias A, Zeniodi M, Karpettas N, Ntineri A Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014; 16(8):462.
PMID: 24924993 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-014-0462-8.
Hodgkinson J, Mant J, Martin U, Guo B, Hobbs F, Deeks J BMJ. 2011; 342:d3621.
PMID: 21705406 PMC: 3122300. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3621.