» Articles » PMID: 16534404

Home Blood Pressure Self-monitoring: Diagnostic Performance in White-coat Hypertension

Overview
Date 2006 Mar 15
PMID 16534404
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic performance of home blood pressure self-monitoring in white-coat hypertension using a 3-day reading program.

Material And Methods: One hundred and ninety nontreated patients recently diagnosed with mild-moderate hypertension, selected consecutively at four primary healthcare centers in the city of Barcelona, were included. Each patient underwent morning and night home blood pressure self-monitoring with readings in triplicate for three consecutive days, followed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The normality cut-off point value for home blood pressure self-monitoring and daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was 135/85 mmHg.

Results: Sixty-three patients were diagnosed with white-coat hypertension with home blood pressure self-monitoring (34.8%; 95% confidence interval: 27.9-42.2) and 74 with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (41.6%; 95% confidence interval: 33.7-48.4). No statistically significant differences were observed between home blood pressure self-monitoring values and those of diurnal ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [137.4 (14.3)/82.1 (8.3) mmHg vs. 134.8 (11.3)/81.3 (9.5) mmHg]. Home blood pressure self-monitoring diagnostic performance parameters were sensitivity 50.0% (95% confidence interval: 38.3-61.7), specificity 75.7% (95% confidence interval: 66.3-83.2), positive and negative predictive values 58.7% (95% confidence interval: 45.6-70.8) and 68.6% (95% confidence interval: 59.4-76.7), respectively, and positive and negative probability coefficients 2.05 and 0.66, respectively. Analysis of different normality cut-off points using a receiver operating characteristic curve failed to produce significant improvement in the diagnostic performance of home blood pressure self-monitoring.

Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of a 3-day home blood pressure self-monitoring reading program in white-coat hypertension was poor. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring continues to be the test of choice for this indication.

Citing Articles

Agreement between attended home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in adolescents with chronic kidney disease.

Glenn T, Eaton C, Psoter K, Eakin M, Pruette C, Riekert K Pediatr Nephrol. 2022; 37(10):2405-2413.

PMID: 35166919 PMC: 9376201. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05479-4.


Options for the diagnosis of high blood pressure in primary care: a systematic review and economic model.

Constanti M, Boffa R, Floyd C, Wierzbicki A, McManus R, Glover M J Hum Hypertens. 2020; 35(5):455-461.

PMID: 32461579 PMC: 8134050. DOI: 10.1038/s41371-020-0357-x.


Practical Aspects of Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Peixoto A Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016; 11(4):214-8.

PMID: 27057289 PMC: 4814006. DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-11-4-214.


Home blood pressure monitoring: primary role in hypertension management.

Stergiou G, Kollias A, Zeniodi M, Karpettas N, Ntineri A Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014; 16(8):462.

PMID: 24924993 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-014-0462-8.


Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review.

Hodgkinson J, Mant J, Martin U, Guo B, Hobbs F, Deeks J BMJ. 2011; 342:d3621.

PMID: 21705406 PMC: 3122300. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3621.