» Articles » PMID: 16527577

Efficacy of Sacral Neuromodulation for Symptomatic Treatment of Refractory Urinary Urge Incontinence

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2006 Mar 11
PMID 16527577
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the efficacy and complications of sacral neuromodulation as therapy for refractory urinary urge incontinence.

Methods: Forty-one patients (mean age 54.3 +/- 15.8 years) with urge incontinence refractory to conservative therapy (ie, pharmacologic, behavioral, biofeedback therapy) were retrospectively evaluated. The patients included those who received permanent one-staged or two-staged InterStim implants. Surgical implantation of the InterStim was performed in patients who experienced a greater than 50% reduction in urge incontinence symptoms, as documented by voiding diaries during a 3 to 7-day test stimulation period.

Results: Ninety percent of patients had 50% or greater improvement in presenting symptoms and quality-of-life parameters after InterStim implantation, with a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range 12 to 26.5) for single-stage and 4.5 months (interquartile range 1.5 to 12) for staged implants (P = 0.0003 Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Patients with urge incontinence had a significant reduction in mean leaking episodes (from 8.8 to 2.3 per day, P = 0.0001), with a significant decrease in the mean number of pads used (from 4.7 to 0.82 per day, P < 0.0001). No patient experienced operative complications, and postoperative complications were encountered in 29% of patients.

Conclusions: Our results have demonstrated that sacral neuromodulation is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence that is refractory to other more conservative forms of treatment.

Citing Articles

Intermediate-term results of a prospective, multicenter study on remote programming sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder.

Zhang Y, Meng L, Zhang P, Tian X, Chen G, Li Y Transl Androl Urol. 2021; 10(5):1966-1975.

PMID: 34159077 PMC: 8185673. DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-43.


A comparison of sacral neuromodulation vs. transvaginal electrical stimulation for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder: the impact on quality of life, body image, sexual function, and emotional well-being.

La Rosa V, Platania A, Ciebiera M, Garzon S, Jedra R, Ponta M Prz Menopauzalny. 2019; 18(2):89-93.

PMID: 31485205 PMC: 6719634. DOI: 10.5114/pm.2019.86834.


Electrical stimulation with non-implanted electrodes for overactive bladder in adults.

Stewart F, Gameiro L, El Dib R, Gameiro M, Kapoor A, Amaro J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 12:CD010098.

PMID: 27935011 PMC: 6463833. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010098.pub4.


Sacral neuromodulation in overactive bladder: a review and current perspectives.

Sukhu T, Kennelly M, Kurpad R Res Rep Urol. 2016; 8:193-199.

PMID: 27822462 PMC: 5087764. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S89544.


Neuromodulation for overactive bladder.

Bartley J, Gilleran J, Peters K Nat Rev Urol. 2013; 10(9):513-21.

PMID: 23817408 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.143.