» Articles » PMID: 16523999

There is a Time and a Place for Everything: Bidirectional Modulations of Latent Inhibition by Time-induced Context Differentiation

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2006 Mar 10
PMID 16523999
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) is defined as poorer evidence of learning with a stimulus that previously was presented without consequence, as compared with a novel or previously attended stimulus. The present article reviews the evidence, mostly from three-stage conditioned taste aversion studies (preexposure, conditioning, and test), that LI can be either attenuated or enhanced depending on the length of the retention interval between conditioning and test and where that interval was spent. Time-induced reduction in LI is observed when the interval context is the same as that of the preexposure, conditioning, and test stages. Super-LI is obtained when a long retention interval is spent in a context that is different from that of the other stages. The differential modulations of LI appear to be the result of the strengthening of primacy effects (i.e., first training disproportionately stronger than subsequent training) by long-interval different contexts, thereby producing super-LI, and the reversal of this effect by long-interval same contexts, thereby producing attenuated LI. The bidirectional effects of time/ context modulations on LI, unaccounted for by current learning theories, are explained, in part, by a time-induced context differentiation process. Implications for theories of LI, learning, and, memory are discussed.

Citing Articles

Behavioral and neural mechanisms of latent inhibition.

Miller D, Rassaby M, Collins K, Milad M Learn Mem. 2022; 29(2):38-47.

PMID: 35042827 PMC: 8774194. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053439.121.


Circadian-temporal context and latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion: Effect of restriction in the intake of the conditioned taste stimulus.

Molero-Chamizo A Learn Behav. 2016; 45(2):157-163.

PMID: 27837417 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0251-0.


Appetitive context conditioning proactively, but transiently, interferes with expression of counterconditioned context fear.

Holmes N, Westbrook R Learn Mem. 2014; 21(11):597-605.

PMID: 25320352 PMC: 4201809. DOI: 10.1101/lm.035089.114.


The role of injection cues in the production of the morphine preexposure effect in taste aversion learning.

Davis C, de Brugada I, Riley A Learn Behav. 2010; 38(2):103-10.

PMID: 20400730 DOI: 10.3758/LB.38.2.103.


Gustatory insular cortex lesions disrupt drug-induced, but not lithium chloride-induced, suppression of conditioned stimulus intake.

Geddes R, Han L, Baldwin A, Norgren R, Grigson P Behav Neurosci. 2008; 122(5):1038-50.

PMID: 18823161 PMC: 3684281. DOI: 10.1037/a0012748.


References
1.
Baruch I, Hemsley D, Gray J . Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988; 176(10):598-606. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198810000-00004. View

2.
Wright A, Santiago H, Sands S, Kendrick D, Cook R . Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people. Science. 1985; 229(4710):287-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.9304205. View

3.
Brooks D, Bouton M . A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1993; 19(1):77-89. DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.19.1.77. View

4.
Aguado L, de Brugada I, Hall G, Agate L . Tests for inhibition after extinction of a conditioned stimulus in the flavour aversion procedure. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2001; 54(3):201-17. DOI: 10.1080/02724990042000164. View

5.
Lubow R, Gewirtz J . Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychol Bull. 1995; 117(1):87-103. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.87. View