» Articles » PMID: 16517306

Clinical Evaluation of Anatomic Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Comparisons Among 3 Different Procedures

Overview
Journal Arthroscopy
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Mar 7
PMID 16517306
Citations 166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with that of nonanatomic single- and double-bundle reconstructions.

Type Of Study: Prospective comparative cohort study.

Methods: Seventy-two patients with unilateral ACL-deficient knees were randomly divided into 3 groups. Concerning all background factors, there were no statistical differences among the 3 groups. In group S (n = 24), single-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed. In group N-AD (n = 24), nonanatomic double-bundle reconstruction was carried out. In group AD (n = 24), anatomic double-bundle reconstruction was performed. One surgeon performed all operations using hamstring tendon autografts. Each patient underwent clinical examinations, before surgery and at 2 years.

Results: No intraoperative and postoperative complications were experienced in each group. There were no significant differences concerning the time for operation among the 3 groups. The statistical analysis showed a significant difference in the postoperative side-to-side anterior laxity among the 3 groups (P = .006). The laxity was significantly less (P = .002) in group AD (1.1 mm) than in group S (2.8 mm), while there was no significant difference (P = .072) between groups AD and N-AD. Concerning the pivot-shift test, group AD was significantly superior to group S (P = .025). There were no significant differences in the range of knee motion, the muscle torque, and the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation.

Conclusions: On the basis of the KT-2000 measurement, the side-to-side anterior laxity of our anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction was significantly better than that of the single-bundle reconstruction with the hamstring tendon graft, although there were no significant differences in the other clinical measures among any of the 3 procedures.

Level Of Evidence: Level II.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Angle Between the Long Axis of the Femoral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Footprint and Bony Morphology of the Knee: A Cadaveric Descriptive Study.

Suruga M, Iriuchishima T, Yahagi Y, Iwama G, Horaguchi T, Aizawa S Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(5):510-516.

PMID: 38694688 PMC: 11058129. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01131-5.


Lateral meniscal injury without medial meniscal injury indicates the existence of the Segond fracture in ACL-deficient knees.

Suzuki N, Watanabe A, Ninomiya T, Nakajima H, Horii M, Watanabe S Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2024; 35:59-64.

PMID: 38236496 PMC: 10792093. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2023.11.004.


Remnant tissue enhances early postoperative biomechanical strength and infiltration of Scleraxis-positive cells within the grafted tendon in a rat anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model.

Kawakami J, Hisanaga S, Yoshimoto Y, Mashimo T, Kaneko T, Yoshimura N PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293944.

PMID: 37939095 PMC: 10631660. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293944.


Effects of Preserving Anatomically Positioned and Adequate Remnant ACL Tissue in Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction.

Sato D, Inoue M, Kasahara Y, Hamano H, Suzuki R, Kondo E Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(4):23259671231162389.

PMID: 37113140 PMC: 10126626. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231162389.


Rate of Torque Development in the Quadriceps after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Young Female Athletes.

Suzuki M, Ishida T, Samukawa M, Matsumoto H, Ito Y, Aoki Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36142034 PMC: 9517280. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811761.