» Articles » PMID: 16515992

Prevalence, Treatment Modalities and Prognosis of Familial Prostate Cancer in a Screened Population

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2006 Mar 7
PMID 16515992
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: A family history of prostate cancer is an important risk factor for this disease. The clinical presentation and prognosis of familial disease remain uncertain. In this study these entities are evaluated in the first and second rounds of a screening program in The Netherlands.

Materials And Methods: Of all men randomized in the Rotterdam section of the ERSPC, 19,970 men were eligible for screening. Information regarding the family history was obtained by a self-administered questionnaire at baseline.

Results: In the prevalence screen the cancer detection rate in 1,364 men (7.1%) with a positive family history was 7.7% (106 cancers in 1,364 screened men with a positive family history) while the positive predictive value of the biopsies was 32.2% (154 cancers of 532 biopsies). In 12,803 sporadic cases the detection rate was 4.7% and the positive predictive value was 23.6% (p <0.0001 and 0.003, RR 1.63). No clinicopathological differences were found in the 1,559 men diagnosed in the first and second rounds. The overall biochemical-free survival rate after a mean followup of 56.8 months (range 0 to 129.9) was 76.8%, and was not significantly different in familial and sporadic cases (p = 0.840). These findings were consistent for the specific treatment modalities as well.

Conclusions: Although screened men 55 to 75 years old with a father or a brother having prostate cancer themselves are at a substantially greater risk for the disease, the clinical presentation, treatment modalities and prognosis by biochemical progression are not different compared to sporadic cases.

Citing Articles

The association of family history of prostate cancer with the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in Korean population.

Park J, Koo K, Chung B, Lee K Investig Clin Urol. 2019; 60(6):442-446.

PMID: 31692911 PMC: 6821985. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.6.442.


CTCF regulates the FoxO signaling pathway to affect the progression of prostate cancer.

Shan Z, Li Y, Yu S, Wu J, Zhang C, Ma Y J Cell Mol Med. 2019; 23(5):3130-3139.

PMID: 30873749 PMC: 6484331. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14138.


The impact of a family history of prostate cancer on the prognosis and features of the disease in Korea: results from a cross-sectional longitudinal pilot study.

Lee K, Koo K, Chung B Int Urol Nephrol. 2017; 49(12):2119-2125.

PMID: 28905176 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1696-6.


Genistein downregulates onco-miR-1260b and upregulates sFRP1 and Smad4 via demethylation and histone modification in prostate cancer cells.

Hirata H, Hinoda Y, Shahryari V, Deng G, Tanaka Y, Tabatabai Z Br J Cancer. 2014; 110(6):1645-54.

PMID: 24504368 PMC: 3960620. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.48.


microRNA-183 is an oncogene targeting Dkk-3 and SMAD4 in prostate cancer.

Ueno K, Hirata H, Shahryari V, Deng G, Tanaka Y, Tabatabai Z Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(8):1659-67.

PMID: 23538390 PMC: 3668476. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.125.