» Articles » PMID: 16508913

Prediction of Specific Absorption Rate in Mother and Fetus Associated with MRI Examinations During Pregnancy

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Mar 2
PMID 16508913
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is uncertainty regarding the risk posed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to pregnant patients. The most frequently used methods, such as single-shot fast spin echo (ssFSE), often require operation at the specific absorption rate (SAR) limits imposed by safety guidelines. With the introduction of higher-field systems, such limits will be even more significant for fetal imaging. An electromagnetic solver based on the time domain finite integration technique (FIT) was used to predict SAR in an anatomically realistic model of a pregnant patient (28 weeks' gestation) associated with the radiofrequency (RF) fields from birdcage body coils typical of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI systems (i.e., operating at approximately 64 and 127 MHz, respectively). The results suggest that 1) the highest local SAR is in the mother, with the fetus being exposed to a peak of approximately 40-60% of that value at 64 MHz, increasing to approximately 50-70% at 127 MHz; 2) compliance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines requires control of SAR values averaged over 1 g or 10 g of tissue, respectively; and 3) compliance with Medical Device Agency (MDA) guidelines requires control of the maximum SAR(10g) within the fetus.

Citing Articles

Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in fetal organs and placenta using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) across gestational ages.

Chandra Sekhar P, Rangasami R, Andrew C, Natarajan P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23811.

PMID: 39394357 PMC: 11470107. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73902-x.


Establishing and Comparing the Normal apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of Fetal Organs and Placenta Using 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 T MRI at Various Gestational Age.

Chandrasekhar P, Rangasami R, Andrew C, Paarthipan N Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024; 33(4):621-630.

PMID: 38784210 PMC: 11111180. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.8.


The Role of Magnetic Resonance Pulse Sequences in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Women.

Nguyen T, Le H, Nguyen D, Quang Nguyen H, Nguyen N, Vo D Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e51312.

PMID: 38288189 PMC: 10823294. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51312.


Estimate of fetal brain temperature using proton resonance frequency thermometry during 3 Tesla fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Ellison J, Kim K, Li Y, Mu X, Glenn O, Ozhinsky E Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(12):7987-7995.

PMID: 38106288 PMC: 10722078. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-708.


Local SAR management strategies to use two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3 T.

Yetisir F, Abaci Turk E, Adalsteinsson E, Wald L, Grant P Magn Reson Med. 2023; 91(3):1165-1178.

PMID: 37929768 PMC: 10843691. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29913.