Minimal Clinically Important Change for Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and General Health Status in Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Overview

Journal Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2006 Mar 2

PMID 16508555

Citations 107

Authors

Nicole van der Roer

Raymond W J G Ostelo

Geertruida E Bekkering

Maurits W Van Tulder

Henrica C W de Vet

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Cohort study.

Objectives: To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Change (MCIC) of the pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS), the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and the Euroqol (EQ) in patients with low back pain.

Summary Of Background Data: MCIC can provide valuable information for researchers, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

Methods: Data from a randomized controlled trial with 442 patients with low back pain were used. The MCIC was estimated over a 12-week period, and three different methods were used: 1) mean change scores, 2) minimal detectable change, and 3) optimal cutoff point in receiver operant curves. The global perceived effect scale (GPE) was used as an external criterion. The effect of initial scores on the MCIC was also assessed.

Results: The MCIC of the PI-NRS ranged from 3.5 to 4.7 points in (sub)acute patients and 2.5 to 4.5 points in chronic patients with low back pain. The MCIC of the QBPDS was estimated between 17.5 to 32.9 points and 8.5 to 24.6 points for (sub)acute and chronic patients with low back pain. The MCIC for the EQ ranged from 0.07 to 0.58 in (sub)acute patients and 0.09 to 0.28 in patients with chronic low back pain.

Conclusion: Reporting the percentage of patients who have made a MCIC adds to the interpretability of study results. We present a range of MCIC values and advocate the choice of a single MCIC value according to the specific context.

Citing Articles

The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the patient's baseline clinical status.

Franceschini M, Boffa A, Di Martino A, Pignotti E, Andriolo L, Zaffagnini S J Exp Orthop. 2025; 12(1):e70137.

PMID: 39931152 PMC: 11808252. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70137.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Jurak I, Grabar S, Zura N, Jakus L Physiother Res Int. 2024; 30(1):e70009.

PMID: 39572389 PMC: 11582020. DOI: 10.1002/pri.70009.

Baseline and 2-year differences in spinal symptoms and spinal and hip mobility in early axial spondyloarthritis and non-axial spondyloarthritis chronic back pain patients.

Bento da Silva A, Ramiro S, van Lunteren M, Marques M, van de Sande M, Fongen C RMD Open. 2024; 10(4).

PMID: 39461873 PMC: 11529763. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004713.

Criteria for determining if a treatment for pain works.

Bogduk N Interv Pain Med. 2024; 1(Suppl 2):100125.

PMID: 39239124 PMC: 11372980. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100125.

The therapeutic effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided intra-articular sacroiliac joint injections in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction, an observational study.

Kristoff T, Sinopoli J, Farley T, Rabah N, Thompson N, Goyal K Interv Pain Med. 2024; 2(3):100269.

PMID: 39238906 PMC: 11373076. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100269.