» Articles » PMID: 16507110

Determination of Strongly Overlapping Signaling Activity from Microarray Data

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2006 Mar 2
PMID 16507110
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: As numerous diseases involve errors in signal transduction, modern therapeutics often target proteins involved in cellular signaling. Interpretation of the activity of signaling pathways during disease development or therapeutic intervention would assist in drug development, design of therapy, and target identification. Microarrays provide a global measure of cellular response, however linking these responses to signaling pathways requires an analytic approach tuned to the underlying biology. An ongoing issue in pattern recognition in microarrays has been how to determine the number of patterns (or clusters) to use for data interpretation, and this is a critical issue as measures of statistical significance in gene ontology or pathways rely on proper separation of genes into groups.

Results: Here we introduce a method relying on gene annotation coupled to decompositional analysis of global gene expression data that allows us to estimate specific activity on strongly coupled signaling pathways and, in some cases, activity of specific signaling proteins. We demonstrate the technique using the Rosetta yeast deletion mutant data set, decompositional analysis by Bayesian Decomposition, and annotation analysis using ClutrFree. We determined from measurements of gene persistence in patterns across multiple potential dimensionalities that 15 basis vectors provides the correct dimensionality for interpreting the data. Using gene ontology and data on gene regulation in the Saccharomyces Genome Database, we identified the transcriptional signatures of several cellular processes in yeast, including cell wall creation, ribosomal disruption, chemical blocking of protein synthesis, and, critically, individual signatures of the strongly coupled mating and filamentation pathways.

Conclusion: This works demonstrates that microarray data can provide downstream indicators of pathway activity either through use of gene ontology or transcription factor databases. This can be used to investigate the specificity and success of targeted therapeutics as well as to elucidate signaling activity in normal and disease processes.

Citing Articles

Matrix factorization and transfer learning uncover regulatory biology across multiple single-cell ATAC-seq data sets.

Erbe R, Kessler M, Favorov A, Easwaran H, Gaykalova D, Fertig E Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(12):e68.

PMID: 32392348 PMC: 7337516. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa349.


Enter the Matrix: Factorization Uncovers Knowledge from Omics.

Stein-OBrien G, Arora R, Culhane A, Favorov A, Garmire L, Greene C Trends Genet. 2018; 34(10):790-805.

PMID: 30143323 PMC: 6309559. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.07.003.


CoGAPS matrix factorization algorithm identifies transcriptional changes in AP-2alpha target genes in feedback from therapeutic inhibition of the EGFR network.

Fertig E, Ozawa H, Thakar M, Howard J, Kagohara L, Krigsfeld G Oncotarget. 2016; 7(45):73845-73864.

PMID: 27650546 PMC: 5342018. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12075.


Preferential activation of the hedgehog pathway by epigenetic modulations in HPV negative HNSCC identified with meta-pathway analysis.

Fertig E, Markovic A, Danilova L, Gaykalova D, Cope L, Chung C PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e78127.

PMID: 24223768 PMC: 3817178. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078127.


Gene expression signatures modulated by epidermal growth factor receptor activation and their relationship to cetuximab resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Fertig E, Ren Q, Cheng H, Hatakeyama H, Dicker A, Rodeck U BMC Genomics. 2012; 13:160.

PMID: 22549044 PMC: 3460736. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-160.


References
1.
Katayama S, Tomaru Y, Kasukawa T, Waki K, Nakanishi M, Nakamura M . Antisense transcription in the mammalian transcriptome. Science. 2005; 309(5740):1564-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1112009. View

2.
Bidaut G, Suhre K, Claverie J, Ochs M . Bayesian decomposition analysis of bacterial phylogenomic profiles. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2005; 5(1):63-70. DOI: 10.2165/00129785-200505010-00006. View

3.
Getz G, Levine E, Domany E . Coupled two-way clustering analysis of gene microarray data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(22):12079-84. PMC: 17297. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.210134797. View

4.
Mewes H, Heumann K, Kaps A, Mayer K, Pfeiffer F, Stocker S . MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 27(1):44-8. PMC: 148093. DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.1.44. View

5.
Carr K, Bittner M, Trent J . Gene-expression profiling in human cutaneous melanoma. Oncogene. 2003; 22(20):3076-80. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206448. View