» Articles » PMID: 16504878

Long-term Outcome of Esophagectomy for High-grade Dysplasia or Cancer Found During Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2006 Mar 1
PMID 16504878
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with Barrett's esophagus to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer. We studied the outcome of esophagectomy in a cohort of patients who developed HGD or cancer between 1995 and 2003 while under surveillance for Barrett's. Outcomes were measured by analysis of clinical records, symptom questionnaire, and SF-36 (version 2). In 34 patients, mean surveillance time was 48 months (range, 4-132); the mean number of endoscopies was 10 (range, 3-30). Preoperative diagnosis was HGD in 9 patients (26.5%), carcinoma in situ in 16 (47%), and adenocarcinoma in 9 (26.5%). There was no esophagectomy-related mortality; 10 patients (29%) had complications. At mean follow-up of 46 months (range, 13-108), SF-36 (version 2) results showed quality of life scores equal to or better than those of healthy individuals. Incidence and severity scores (VAS 1-10) for postoperative symptoms were reflux, 59% (2.8); dysphagia, 28% (3.7); bloating, 45% (2.6); nausea, 28% (2.1); and diarrhea, 55% (2.5). Twenty-nine patients (85%) have no clinical, radiographic, or endoscopic evidence of recurrent esophageal cancer or metastasis. One patient has metastatic disease. Endoscopic surveillance in Barrett's patients yields malignant lesions at an early, generally curable, stage. Esophagectomy is curative in the great majority and can be accomplished with minimal mortality and excellent quality of life.

Citing Articles

The Influence of Different Treatment Strategies on the Long-Term Prognosis of T1 Stage Esophageal Cancer Patients.

Pan L, Liu X, Wang W, Zhu L, Yu W, Lv W Front Oncol. 2021; 11:700088.

PMID: 34722247 PMC: 8551622. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.700088.


Comparative quantitative survey of patient experience in Barrett's oesophagus and other gastrointestinal disorders.

Britton J, Taxiarchi P, Martin G, Willert R, Horne M, Hamdy S BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020; 7(1):e000357.

PMID: 32337055 PMC: 7170407. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000357.


Patient-reported outcome domains for the esophageal CONDUIT report card: a prospective trial to establish domains.

Lee M, Yost K, Pierson K, Blackmon S Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018; 16(1):197.

PMID: 30305083 PMC: 6180437. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-1023-7.


Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus for Early Detection of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Qiao Y, Hyder A, Bae S, Zarin W, ONeill T, Marcon N Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015; 6:e131.

PMID: 26658838 PMC: 4816094. DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2015.58.


Early detection and prevention of pancreatic cancer: is it really possible today?.

Del Chiaro M, Segersvard R, Lohr M, Verbeke C World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(34):12118-31.

PMID: 25232247 PMC: 4161798. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12118.


References
1.
Jamieson G, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers J, Devitt P . Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg. 2004; 91(8):943-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4596. View

2.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Aaronson N, Apolone G, Bech P . The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(11):1159-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00107-3. View

3.
Wu P, Posner M . The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2003; 4(8):481-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01167-7. View

4.
Dresner S, Griffin S, Wayman J, Bennett M, Hayes N, Raimes S . Human model of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett's metaplasia. Br J Surg. 2003; 90(9):1120-8. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4169. View

5.
Aly A, Jamieson G . Reflux after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2004; 91(2):137-41. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4508. View