» Articles » PMID: 16491339

Comparative Investigations on the Efficacy of Articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200,000) and Articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200,000) in Local Infiltration Anaesthesia in Dentistry--a Randomised Double-blind Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2006 Feb 24
PMID 16491339
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A randomised double-blind study investigated 155 patients with tooth extractions in the mandibular and maxillary jaws for a loss of anaesthetic potency when reducing the concentration of the active in articaine solutions. Tests were performed on the preparations of articaine 4% with a 1:200,000 addition of epinephrine (Ultracain D-S) and articaine 2% with a 1:200,000 addition of epinephrine (Ultracain 2%-Suprarenin). Local infiltration anaesthesia was the chosen method of anaesthesia. The most noticeable difference observed between the two injection solutions concerned the duration of anaesthesia, which was significantly shortened under the low-dose solution. The 4% articaine solution did not prove superior in local anaesthetic effect. Articaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000, therefore, can be considered a suitable local anaesthetic for tooth extractions.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of articaine in 3-year-old children for dental procedures: a protocol for a clinical randomised control trial in Saudi Arabia.

Alrashdi M, Alhunti A, Almansour A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e077751.

PMID: 37865418 PMC: 10603511. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077751.


Comparing Articaine brands: A randomized non-inferiority controlled trial.

Arboleda-Toro D, Toro L, Osorio-Osorno Y, Castrillon-Pino L, Florez-Zapata N Heliyon. 2021; 7(6):e07252.

PMID: 34195402 PMC: 8233148. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07252.


Local Anesthetic Usage Among Dentists: German and International Data.

Halling F, Neff A, Ziebart T Anesth Prog. 2021; 68(1):19-25.

PMID: 33827123 PMC: 8033583. DOI: 10.2344/anpr-67-03-12.


Promising potential of articaine-loaded poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanocapules for intraoral topical anesthesia.

da Silva C, Volpato M, Muniz B, Dos Santos C, Serpe L, Ferreira L PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0246760.

PMID: 33571275 PMC: 7877576. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246760.


Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial.

Amorim K, Fontes V, Gercina A, Groppo F, Souza L Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 25(6):3527-3533.

PMID: 33151422 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03674-x.


References
1.
WINTHER J, Nathalang B . Effectivity of a new local analgesic Hoe 40 045. Scand J Dent Res. 1972; 80(4):272-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1972.tb00291.x. View

2.
WINTHER J, Patirupanusara B . Evaluation of carticaine - a new local analgesic. Int J Oral Surg. 1974; 3(6):422-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(74)80007-4. View

3.
Ruprecht S . [A comparative study of equimolar solutions of lidocaine and articaine for anesthesia. A randomized double-blind cross-over study]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1991; 101(10):1286-90. View

4.
Isen D . Articaine: pharmacology and clinical use of a recently approved local anesthetic. Dent Today. 2003; 19(11):72-7. View

5.
Lemay H, Albert G, Helie P, Dufour L, Gagnon P, Payant L . [Ultracaine in conventional operative dentistry]. J Can Dent Assoc. 1984; 50(9):703-8. View