» Articles » PMID: 16488728

Risk Analysis in Resection of Thoracic Esophageal Cancer in the Era of Endoscopic Surgery

Overview
Journal Ann Thorac Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2006 Feb 21
PMID 16488728
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Surgical outcomes after thoracoscopic esophagectomy were compared with those after open esophagectomy, and the prognostic values of factors potentially related to mortality and morbidity were evaluated.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 153 patients who underwent esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. The thoracic surgical procedures were categorized into the following three groups: esophagectomy under standard thoracotomy (n = 37), assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with utility minithoracotomy (n = 38), and complete thoracoscopic esophagectomy (n = 78). Mortality and morbidity were compared among the three groups. Then, in a separate multivariate analysis, data on 14 potentially prognostic variables were extracted, and the relation to postoperative outcomes was examined.

Results: Respiratory complications were the most frequent complications in all three groups, and their rate of occurrence was not significantly among the three groups. The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the open group than in the other groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patient age, sex, induction chemoradiation, and forced expiratory volume were independently significant contributing factors for respiratory complications, while the serum total protein concentration and open esophagectomy were significant factors for in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that respiratory complications are still the main cause of operative morbidity when using the thoracoscopic esophagectomy protocol and that use of the thoracoscopic procedure does not decrease the risk of respiratory complications. The use of the thoracoscopic procedure improved postoperative in-hospital mortality. The advantages of thoracoscopic esophagectomy should be investigated further. At this point in time, however, thoracoscopic esophagectomy can be considered a feasible, safe, and advantageous surgical option.

Citing Articles

A refined procedure for esophageal resection using a full minimally invasive approach.

Ashiku S, Patel A, Horton B, Velotta J, Ely S, Avins A J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022; 17(1):29.

PMID: 35246177 PMC: 8895824. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01765-2.


Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer.

Chowdappa R, Dharanikota A, Arjunan R, Althaf S, Premalata C, Ranganath N South Asian J Cancer. 2022; 10(4):230-235.

PMID: 34984201 PMC: 8719958. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730085.


Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Ozawa S, Koyanagi K, Ninomiya Y, Yatabe K, Higuchi T Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020; 4(2):126-134.

PMID: 32258977 PMC: 7105848. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12315.


Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Yang J, Chen L, Ge K, Yang J World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019; 11(11):1081-1091.

PMID: 31798787 PMC: 6883181. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1081.


Novel prognostic score of postoperative complications after transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 90 consecutive patients.

Saito T, Tanaka K, Ebihara Y, Kurashima Y, Murakami S, Shichinohe T Esophagus. 2018; 16(2):155-161.

PMID: 30178429 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-018-0645-5.