» Articles » PMID: 1648415

Structural Investigation of the Covalent and Electrostatic Binding of Yeast Cytochrome C to the Surface of Various Ultrathin Lipid Multilayers Using X-ray Diffraction

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 1991 Apr 1
PMID 1648415
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

X-Ray diffraction was used to characterize the profile structures of ultrathin lipid multilayers having a bound surface layer of cytochrome c. The lipid multilayers were formed on an alkylated glass surface, using the Langmuir-Blodgett method. The ultrathin lipid multilayers of this study were: five monolayers of arachidic acid, four monolayers of arachidic acid with a surface monolayer of dimyristoyl phosphatidylserine, and four monolayers of arachidic acid acid with a surface monolayer of thioethyl stearate. Both the phosphatidylserine and the thioethyl stearate surfaces were found previously to covalently bind yeast cytochrome c, while the arachidic acid surface electrostatically binds yeast cytochrome c. Meridional x-ray diffraction data were collected from these lipid multilayer films with and without a bound yeast cytochrome c surface layer. A box refinement technique, previously shown to be effective in deriving the profile structures of ultrathin multilayer lipid films with and without electrostatically bound cytochrome c, was used to determine the multilayer electron density profiles. The surface monolayer of bound cytochrome c was readily apparent upon comparison of the multilayer electron density profiles for the various pairs of ultrathin multilayer films plus/minus cytochrome c for all cases. In addition, cytochrome c binding to the multilayer surface significantly perturbs the underlying lipid monolayers.

Citing Articles

Molecular dynamics simulations of a hydrated protein vectorially oriented on polar and nonpolar soft surfaces.

Nordgren C, Tobias D, Klein M, Blasie J Biophys J. 2002; 83(6):2906-17.

PMID: 12496067 PMC: 1302375. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75300-9.


Hydration state of single cytochrome c monolayers on soft interfaces via neutron interferometry.

Kneller L, Edwards A, Nordgren C, Blasie J, Berk N, Krueger S Biophys J. 2001; 80(5):2248-61.

PMID: 11325727 PMC: 1301416. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76197-8.


Molecular orientation distributions in protein films: III. Yeast cytochrome c immobilized on pyridyl disulfide-capped phospholipid bilayers.

Edmiston P, Saavedra S Biophys J. 1998; 74(2 Pt 1):999-1006.

PMID: 9533712 PMC: 1302580. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74024-X.


Vectorially oriented monolayers of detergent-solubilized Ca(2+) -ATPase from sarcoplasmic reticulum.

Prokop L, Stongin R, Smith 3rd A, Blasie J, Peticolas L, Bean J Biophys J. 1996; 70(5):2131-43.

PMID: 9172737 PMC: 1225188. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79779-5.


Molecular dynamics simulations of a protein on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces.

Tobias D, Mar W, Blasie J, Klein M Biophys J. 1996; 71(6):2933-41.

PMID: 8968566 PMC: 1233784. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79497-3.


References
1.
Pachence J, Blasie J . The location of cytochrome c on the surface of ultrathin lipid multilayer films using x-ray diffraction. Biophys J. 1987; 52(5):735-47. PMC: 1330178. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83268-X. View

2.
Ganong B, Bell R . Transmembrane movement of phosphatidylglycerol and diacylglycerol sulfhydryl analogues. Biochemistry. 1984; 23(21):4977-83. DOI: 10.1021/bi00316a023. View

3.
Pachence J, Amador S, Maniara G, Vanderkooi J, Dutton P, Blasie J . Orientation and lateral mobility of cytochrome c on the surface of ultrathin lipid multilayer films. Biophys J. 1990; 58(2):379-89. PMC: 1280979. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82384-5. View

4.
Shipley G, LESLIE R, Chapman D . X-ray diffraction study of the interaction of phospholipids with cytochrome c in the aqueous phase. Nature. 1969; 222(5193):561-2. DOI: 10.1038/222561a0. View

5.
Louie G, Hutcheon W, Brayer G . Yeast iso-1-cytochrome c. A 2.8 A resolution three-dimensional structure determination. J Mol Biol. 1988; 199(2):295-314. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90315-4. View