Background:
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major opportunistic agent among transplant recipients. While detection of CMV pp65-lower matrix protein (pp65Ag) is still widely used for monitoring CMV infection, real-time PCR assays have been recently developed for routine quantitation of CMV DNA. However, correlations are lacking between results of pp65Ag and quantitative PCR assays and there is no consensus yet as to the more appropriate blood compartment (whole blood (WB), leukocytes, plasma) to be tested with PCR assays.
Objectives:
The aims of the study were to determine, in a population of transplant recipients: (i) the correlation between pp65Ag and CMV quantitative real-time PCR in our setting and (ii) the utility of plasma CMV DNA quantitation in comparison to WB quantitation.
Methods:
In 170 blood samples (from 61 solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients) with pp65Ag results, CMV quantitation was performed in WB and plasma using an in-house real-time quantitative PCR.
Results:
Real-time PCR and pp65Ag results in WB were correlated: thresholds of 10 and 50(+) cells/200,000 cells were equivalent to 3.3 log(10)copies/mL (2,000 copies/mL) and 3.8 log(10)copies/mL (6,300 copies/mL), respectively. When WB viral load was >or=3.6 log(10)copies/mL, the risk to have a negative plasma CMV DNA result was <or=2.5%.
Conclusions:
For the routine exploration of a single compartment, whole blood would represent a suitable compromise: easy processing for a sensitive assay. The 3.6 log(10)copies/mL threshold, which could help in identifying active CMV infection, deserves further evaluation.
Citing Articles
Cytomegalovirus DNAemia Requiring (Val)Ganciclovir Treatment for More Than 8 Weeks Is a Key Factor in the Development of Antiviral Drug Resistance.
Acquier M, Taton B, Alain S, Garrigue I, Mary J, Pfirmann P
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023; 10(2):ofad018.
PMID: 36817745
PMC: 9933945.
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad018.
Whole Blood versus Plasma Samples-How Does the Type of Specimen Collected for Testing Affect the Monitoring of Cytomegalovirus Viremia?.
Rzepka M, Depka D, Gospodarek-Komkowska E, Bogiel T
Pathogens. 2022; 11(11).
PMID: 36422636
PMC: 9697577.
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11111384.
Fungal and viral infections after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation from unrelated donors in adults: improving outcomes over time.
Parody R, Martino R, de la Camara R, Garcia-Noblejas A, Esquirol A, Garcia-Cadenas I
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014; 50(2):274-81.
PMID: 25347007
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.229.
Killer immunoglobulin-like receptor gene repertoire influences viral load of primary human cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant patients.
Jones D, Peacock S, Hughes D, Traherne J, Allen R, Barnardo M
Genes Immun. 2014; 15(8):562-8.
PMID: 25253288
DOI: 10.1038/gene.2014.53.
Detection of human cytomegalovirus DNA in various blood components after liver transplantation.
Chen X, Hou P, Bi J, Ying C
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014; 47(4):340-4.
PMID: 24714815
PMC: 4075299.
DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x20133353.
Human cytomegalovirus detection by real-time PCR and pp65-antigen test in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a challenge in low and middle-income countries.
Breda G, Almeida B, Carstensen S, Bonfim C, Nogueira M, Vidal L
Pathog Glob Health. 2013; 107(6):312-9.
PMID: 24188241
PMC: 4001611.
DOI: 10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000114.
Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation.
Razonable R, Hayden R
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013; 26(4):703-27.
PMID: 24092851
PMC: 3811235.
DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00015-13.
Rapid quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood by a new molecular assay based on automated sample preparation and real-time PCR.
Raggam R, Bozic M, Salzer H, Hammerschmidt S, Homberg C, Ruzicka K
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2010; 199(4):311-6.
PMID: 20559848
DOI: 10.1007/s00430-010-0164-z.
Surveillance of active human cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HLA sibling identical donor): search for optimal cutoff value by real-time PCR.
Peres R, Costa C, Andrade P, Bonon S, Albuquerque D, de Oliveira C
BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10:147.
PMID: 20515464
PMC: 2890007.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-147.
Comparative evaluation of a commercially available automated system for extraction of viral DNA from whole blood: application to monitoring of epstein-barr virus and cytomegalovirus load.
Pillet S, Bourlet T, Pozzetto B
J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(11):3753-5.
PMID: 19710270
PMC: 2772604.
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01497-09.
Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation in bone marrow transplant recipients by real-time PCR.
Ghaffari S, Obeidi N, Dehghan M, Alimoghaddam K, Gharehbaghian A, Ghavamzadeh A
Pathol Oncol Res. 2008; 14(4):399-409.
PMID: 18392952
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9030-3.
Detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in EDTA whole-blood samples: evaluation of the quantitative artus CMV LightCycler PCR kit in conjunction with automated sample preparation.
Michelin B, Hadzisejdic I, Bozic M, Grahovac M, Hess M, Grahovac B
J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(4):1241-5.
PMID: 18272703
PMC: 2292973.
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01403-07.
Prediction of cytomegalovirus (CMV) plasma load from evaluation of CMV whole-blood load in samples from renal transplant recipients.
Garrigue I, Doussau A, Asselineau J, Bricout H, Couzi L, Rio C
J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 46(2):493-8.
PMID: 18057128
PMC: 2238080.
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01499-07.