» Articles » PMID: 16470427

Retention Versus Removal of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Replacement: a Systematic Literature Review Within the Cochrane Framework

Overview
Journal Acta Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Feb 14
PMID 16470427
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is no consensus as to whether to use a posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining design or a posterior-stabilized design for total knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to establish the difference in functional, clinical, and radiological outcome between retention and removal of the PCL.

Methods: We conducted a search in Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, and Current Contents, along with reference checks and citation tracking. Randomized controlled trials were selected and methodological quality was assessed with the van Tulder and Jadad checklists by 2 independent reviewers.

Results: We found 8 randomized controlled trials. 2 treatment options were compared against PCL retention: PCL removal without post and cam mechanism (2 studies), and posterior-stabilized design (5 studies). 1 study included all 3 options. Range of motion was found to be 8 degrees higher (105 degrees vs. 113 degrees ) in the posterior-stabilized group compared to the PCL retention group (p = 0.01, 95% CI (1.7, 15)).

Interpretation: These results should be interpreted with caution, as the methodological quality of the studies was highly variable. Suggestions are given to improve future research on this specific aspect of knee arthroplasty.

Citing Articles

Developing a Machine-Learning Predictive Model for Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Chen L, Zhang L, Zhou D, Dong S, Xing D Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(6):1381-1389.

PMID: 38693596 PMC: 11144493. DOI: 10.1111/os.14076.


Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.

Puijk R, Sierevelt I, Pijls B, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Nolte P Acta Orthop. 2023; 94:600-606.

PMID: 38093649 PMC: 10719730. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2023.33283.


The Early Clinical Outcomes Following Unrestricted Caliper Verified Kinematic Alignment Using a Medial Stabilized Design Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Cruciate Retaining Insert.

Munir S, Suzuki L, Hellman J Arthroplast Today. 2023; 24:101250.

PMID: 37920544 PMC: 10618423. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101250.


Medial Pivot Versus Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis Design in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xu Z, Tian S, Zhou X, Wei Y, Wu C, Jia X Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56(9):1506-1524.

PMID: 36052392 PMC: 9385931. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00678-5.


Comparison of in vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty between cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting insert.

Iwamoto K, Yamazaki T, Sugamoto K, Tomita T Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2021; 26:47-52.

PMID: 34722162 PMC: 8521180. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2021.10.002.