» Articles » PMID: 16463914

Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage from 1940 to 2003

Overview
Journal Demography
Specialty Public Health
Date 2006 Feb 9
PMID 16463914
Citations 148
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper reports trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003 in the United States. Analyses of census and Current Population Survey data show that educational homogamy decreased from 1940 to 1960 but increased from 1960 to 2003. From 1960 to the early 1970s, increases in educational homogamy were generated by decreasing intermarriage among groups of relatively well-educated persons. College graduates, in particular; were increasingly likely to marry each other rather than those with less education. Beginning in the early 1970s, however; continued increases in the odds of educational homogamy were generated by decreases in intermarriage at both ends of the education distribution. Most striking is the decline in the odds that those with very low levels of education marry up. Intermarriage between college graduates and those with "some college" continued to decline but at a more gradual pace. As intermarriage declined at the extremes of the education distribution, intermarriage among those in the middle portion of the distribution increased. These trends, which are similar for a broad cross section of married couples and for newlyweds, are consistent with a growing social divide between those with very low levels of education and those with more education in the United States.

Citing Articles

Educational constraints on marital sorting and income mobility.

Gao N PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0313710.

PMID: 39970176 PMC: 11838900. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313710.


Hypergamy reconsidered: Marriage in England, 1837-2021.

Clark G, Cummins N PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316769.

PMID: 39899555 PMC: 11790178. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316769.


Blocked paths, unequal trajectories: Examining the career outcomes of health professions graduates by race, gender, and place of education.

Schut R Soc Sci Med. 2024; 364:117522.

PMID: 39579434 PMC: 11898113. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117522.


Relative Economic Position and Female Marriage Migration: Marrying Men in Taiwan across Borders and Boundaries.

Qian Z, Tsai M Popul Res Policy Rev. 2024; 41(4):1451-1470.

PMID: 39006206 PMC: 11245283. DOI: 10.1007/s11113-021-09696-x.


International Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Assortative Mating for Educational Attainment.

Jensen S, Kirkegaard E Evol Psychol. 2024; 22(2):14747049241249072.

PMID: 38826058 PMC: 11146041. DOI: 10.1177/14747049241249072.


References
1.
Fischer C, Stockmayer G, Stiles J, Hout M . Distinguishing the geographic levels and social dimensions of U.S. metropolitan segregation, 1960-2000. Demography. 2004; 41(1):37-59. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2004.0002. View

2.
Epstein E, Guttman R . Mate selection in man: evidence, theory, and outcome. Soc Biol. 1984; 31(3-4):243-78. DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1984.9988579. View

3.
Bumpass L, Martin T, Sweet J . The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. J Fam Issues. 1991; 12(1):22-42. DOI: 10.1177/019251391012001003. View

4.
Kalmijn M . Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annu Rev Sociol. 2002; (24):395-421. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395. View

5.
Cavalli-Sforza L, Feldman M . Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Monogr Popul Biol. 1981; 16:1-388. View