» Articles » PMID: 16462215

Efficacy of Pneumatic Compression Stocking Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Following 139 Lumbar Laminectomies with Instrumented Fusions

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Feb 8
PMID 16462215
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Low-dose heparin (LDH) regimens reduce the frequency of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in spinal surgery but pose a risk of postoperative hemorrhage threatening neurologic function. Pneumatic compression stocking (CS) could provide an alternative means of mechanical prophylaxis alone against DVT and PE and would possibly avoid its hemorrhagic complications.

Methods: The efficacy of CS alone in preventing DVT and PE was evaluated in 139 patients undergoing multilevel lumbar laminectomies (average 3.8 levels) with instrumented fusions (average 1.4 levels). All patients received CS stocking prophylaxis intraoperatively and throughout the average 5-day postoperative course including following ambulation. Doppler screening for DVT was routinely performed 2 days postoperatively. Subsequent Doppler studies or computed tomography angiograms were selectively performed in symptomatic patients with potential DVT/PE.

Results: Four (2.8%) patients developed DVT 2-6 days postoperatively and required inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. One of the four had a positive routine screening Doppler study performed the second postoperative day. Two developed DVT the fourth postoperative day. The fourth patient developed DVT 6 days postoperatively but 3 weeks later embolized around the IVC filter. This patient, the only one to develop a PE, tested positive for Factor V Leiden mutation (hypercoagulable syndrome) and remains on long-term warfarin.

Conclusions: Pneumatic compression stocking prophylaxis effectively reduced the incidence of DVT (2.8%) and PE (0.7%) in 139 patients undergoing multilevel lumbar laminectomies with instrumented fusions. These rates compared favorably with those reported in spinal series employing LDH prophylaxis.

Citing Articles

Development of multidisciplinary, evidenced-based protocol recommendations and implementation strategies for anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery following a literature review.

Meyrat R, Vivian E, Sridhar A, Gulden R, Bruce S, Martinez A Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(47):e36142.

PMID: 38013300 PMC: 10681460. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036142.


Factors Affecting the Decision to Initiate Anticoagulation After Spine Surgery: Findings From the AOSpine Anticoagulation Global Initiative.

Gandhi S, Khanna K, Harada G, Louie P, Harrop J, Mroz T Global Spine J. 2020; 12(4):548-558.

PMID: 32911980 PMC: 9109571. DOI: 10.1177/2192568220948027.


Perioperative Anticoagulation Management in Spine Surgery: Initial Findings From the AO Spine Anticoagulation Global Survey.

Louie P, Harada G, Harrop J, Mroz T, Al-Saleh K, Barbanti Brodano G Global Spine J. 2020; 10(5):512-527.

PMID: 32677576 PMC: 7359688. DOI: 10.1177/2192568219897598.


Thromboprophylaxis in elective spinal surgery: A protocol for systematic review.

Colomina M, Bago J, Perez-Bracchiglione J, Nishishinya Aquino M, Salas K, Requeijo C Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(21):e20127.

PMID: 32481281 PMC: 7249943. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020127.


Venous Thromboprophylaxis in Spine Surgery.

Alvarado A, Porto G, Wessell J, Buchholz A, Arnold P Global Spine J. 2020; 10(1 Suppl):65S-70S.

PMID: 31934524 PMC: 6947674. DOI: 10.1177/2192568219858307.