» Articles » PMID: 16454827

The Prevalence Rate and Anatomic Location of Colorectal Adenoma and Cancer Detected by Colonoscopy in Average-risk Individuals Aged 40-80 Years

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2006 Feb 4
PMID 16454827
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The role of screening colonoscopy for colorectal (CR) neoplasia in average-risk population, remains to be determined.

Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence and anatomic location of CR adenoma and carcinoma and the morbidity of colonoscopy in individuals at average risk for CR cancer (CRC).

Methods: A retrospective prevalence study of subjects aged 40-80 yr, with no cancer-related symptoms, personal or family history of CR neoplasia, who underwent a colonoscopy.

Results: Enrolled were 1,177 persons; 183 aged 40-49 yr (young), 917 aged 50-75 yr, and 77 aged 76-80 yr (elderly). The prevalence of overall CR neoplasia, advanced neoplasia, and cancer was 20.9%, 6.3%, and 1.1%, respectively. In the 50-75 age group, the prevalence of overall adenoma, advanced neoplasia, and cancer was 21.3%, 6.7%, and 1.2%, respectively. Of the 206 neoplasia cases, 21-43% harbored proximal neoplasia beyond the reach of sigmoidoscopy, without distal lesions. Among the elderly, the prevalence of overall adenoma, advanced neoplasia, and cancer reached 26.0%, 14.3%, and 2.6%, respectively. In the young group, 9.8% had overall neoplasia, 1.1% had advanced adenoma, and none had CRC. Procedure-related morbidity rate was 0.1%, with no perforations, bleedings, or mortality.

Conclusions: Screening colonoscopy in average-risk subjects demonstrated a considerable prevalence of CR neoplasia and proximal lesions beyond the reach of sigmoidoscopy. The morbidity rate was negligible. Primary screening colonoscopy should be considered in health programs for the average-risk population, beginning at the age of 50 yr. The significantly high rate of advanced and proximal neoplasia in the elderly, encourages the inclusion of healthy subjects aged 76-80 yr in future prospective studies.

Citing Articles

A Large Comparative Cohort Study of Colonoscopy in the Elderly: Indications, Outcomes, and Technical Aspects.

Abu Baker F, Farah A, Mari A, Nicola D, Hazzan R, Gal O Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77619.

PMID: 39963650 PMC: 11831861. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77619.


Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in the Geriatric Population.

Cheong J, Faye A, Shaukat A Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2023; 25(7):141-145.

PMID: 37219764 PMC: 10330554. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-023-00875-8.


Colonoscopy Needs for Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Ukraine.

Welten V, Wanis K, Semeniv S, Shabat G, Dabekaussen K, Davids J World J Surg. 2022; 46(10):2476-2486.

PMID: 35835863 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06656-0.


New considerations for colorectal cancer screening based on the demographic profile of colorectal cancer in a Greek population.

Panteris V, Karantanos P, Vasilakis N, Vgenopoulou S, Lymperopoulou G, Feretzakis G Mol Clin Oncol. 2022; 16(3):57.

PMID: 35111323 PMC: 8771310. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2490.


Circulating 27-hydroxycholesterol and Risk of Colorectal Adenomas and Serrated Polyps.

Passarelli M, Thompson B, McDonald J, Snover D, Palys T, Rees J Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021; 14(4):479-488.

PMID: 33408073 PMC: 8026496. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0414.