» Articles » PMID: 16454357

The Effect of Simulated Microgravity by Three-dimensional Clinostat on Bone Tissue Engineering

Overview
Journal Cell Transplant
Date 2006 Feb 4
PMID 16454357
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence suggests that mechanical stress, including gravity, is associated with osteoblast differentiation and function. To examine effects of microgravity on bone tissue engineering, we used a three-dimensional (3D) clinostat manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Kobe, Japan). A 3D clinostat is a device that generates multidirectional G force. By controlled rotation on two axes, it cancels the cumulative gravity vector at the center of the device. We cultured rat marrow mesenchymal cells (MMCs) in the pores of interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite (IP-CHA) for 2 weeks in the presence of dexamethasone using the 3D clinostat (clinostat group). MMCs cultured using the 3D clinostat exhibited a 40% decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity (a marker of osteoblastic differentiation), compared with control static cultures (control group). SEM analysis revealed that although there was no difference between the two groups in number or distribution of cells in the pores, the clinostat group exhibited less extensive extracellular matrix formation than the control group. Cultured IP-CHA/MMC composites were then implanted into subcutaneous sites of syngeneic rats and harvested 8 weeks after implantation. All implants showed bone formation inside the pores, as indicated by decalcified histological sections and microfocus computed tomography. However, the volume of newly formed bone was significantly lower for the clinostat group than for the control group, especially in the superficial pores close to the implant surface. These results indicate that new bone formation in culture was inhibited by use of the 3D clinostat, and that this inhibition was mainly due to suppression of osteoblastic differentiation of MMCs.

Citing Articles

Cellular response in three-dimensional spheroids and tissues exposed to real and simulated microgravity: a narrative review.

van den Nieuwenhof D, Moroni L, Chou J, Hinkelbein J NPJ Microgravity. 2024; 10(1):102.

PMID: 39505879 PMC: 11541851. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-024-00442-z.


Heterotypic Cell Culture from Mouse Bone Marrow under Simulated Microgravity: Lessons for Stromal Lineage Functions.

Markina E, Tyrina E, Ratushnyy A, Andreeva E, Buravkova L Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(18).

PMID: 37762048 PMC: 10531336. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241813746.


3D cell culture model: From ground experiment to microgravity study.

Ma C, Duan X, Lei X Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1136583.

PMID: 37034251 PMC: 10080128. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1136583.


Scaffold-based bone tissue engineering in microgravity: potential, concerns and implications.

Mochi F, Scatena E, Rodriguez D, Ginebra M, Del Gaudio C NPJ Microgravity. 2022; 8(1):45.

PMID: 36309540 PMC: 9617896. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-022-00236-1.


The Cardiovascular System in Space: Focus on In Vivo and In Vitro Studies.

Baran R, Marchal S, Garcia Campos S, Rehnberg E, Tabury K, Baselet B Biomedicines. 2022; 10(1).

PMID: 35052739 PMC: 8773383. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010059.