» Articles » PMID: 16451711

A Regression Based Transmission/disequilibrium Test for Binary Traits: the Power of Joint Tests for Linkage and Association

Overview
Journal BMC Genet
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2006 Feb 3
PMID 16451711
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In this analysis we applied a regression based transmission disequilibrium test to the binary trait presence or absence of Kofendred Personality Disorder in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 (GAW14) simulated dataset and determined the power and type I error rate of the method at varying map densities and sample sizes. To conduct this transmission disequilibrium test, the logit transformation was applied to a binary outcome and regressed on an indicator variable for the transmitted allele from informative matings. All 100 replicates from chromosomes 1, 3, 5, and 9 for the Aipotu and the combined Aipotu, Karangar, and Danacaa populations were used at densities of 3, 1, and 0.3 cM. Power and type I error were determined by the number of replicates significant at the 0.05 level.

Results: The maximum power to detect linkage and association with the Aipotu population was 93% for chromosome 3 using a 0.3-cM map. For chromosomes 1, 5, and 9 the power was less than 10% at the 3-cM scan and less than 22% for the 0.3-cM map. With the larger sample size, power increased to 38% for chromosome 1, 100% for chromosome 3, 31% for chromosome 5, and 23% for chromosome 9. Type I error was approximately 7%.

Conclusion: The power of this method is highly dependent on the amount of information in a region. This study suggests that single-point methods are not particularly effective in narrowing a fine-mapping region, particularly when using single-nucleotide polymorphism data and when linkage disequilibrium in the region is variable.

References
1.
Xiong M, Jin L . Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping for genome screens. Genet Epidemiol. 2000; 19(3):211-34. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2272(200010)19:3<211::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-L. View

2.
Zollner S, Wen X, Hanchard N, Herbert M, Ober C, Pritchard J . Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 74(1):62-72. PMC: 1181913. DOI: 10.1086/381131. View

3.
Fan R, Jung J . High-resolution joint linkage disequilibrium and linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci based on sibship data. Hum Hered. 2004; 56(4):166-87. DOI: 10.1159/000076392. View

4.
Elston R, George V, Severtson F . The Elston-Stewart algorithm for continuous genotypes and environmental factors. Hum Hered. 1992; 42(1):16-27. DOI: 10.1159/000154043. View

5.
Spielman R, McGinnis R, Ewens W . Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet. 1993; 52(3):506-16. PMC: 1682161. View