Binocular Processing in the Cat's Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. III. Spatial Frequency, Orientation, and Direction Sensitivity of Nondominant-eye Influences

The present experiments examined the extent to which binocular processing in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) depends upon the spatial frequency, orientation, and direction of movement of stimuli presented to the nondominant eye. In Experiment 1, we tested the effects of varying these stimulus parameters on the responses of LGN cells to nondominant-eye stimulation. Sixteen of 34 cells tested had statistically significant responses to the nondominant eye and, in agreement with a previous study (Guido et al. 1989), the responsive cells were spatial-frequency sensitive. However, there was little evidence for orientation or direction sensitivity in responses to the nondominant eye: changes in discharge with changes in stimulus orientation and direction were small and were statistically significant in only nine of the cells. In Experiment 2, we tested the effects of varying spatial frequency, orientation, and direction of movement of stimuli presented to the nondominant eye on its ability to influence responses to the dominant eye (i.e., on binocular interactions). The dominant eye was stimulated with the optimal spatial frequency for the cell being tested. For 22 of 45 cells tested, nondominant-eye stimulation had a statistically significant effect on the response to the dominant eye. Fourteen of these cells showed band-pass spatial-frequency sensitivity in the nondominant-eye influence, and eight showed low-pass spatial-frequency sensitivity. However, only 11 of the cells had statistically significant variations in their binocular interactions that depended on the orientation or direction of stimuli presented to the nondominant eye. Furthermore, even for those cells, the effect of varying orientation and direction was only about half as strong as the effect of varying spatial frequency. We conclude that binocular processing in the LGN, including responses to the nondominant eye and nondominant-eye influences on responses to the dominant eye, are affected significantly by the spatial frequency of the nondominant-eye stimulus and relatively little by stimulus orientation or direction of movement. The significance of these findings for understanding the functions of LGN binocular processing is discussed.