» Articles » PMID: 16406084

Evaluation of the Biomechanical Behavior of Maxillary Central Incisors Restored by Means of Endocrowns Compared to a Natural Tooth: a 3D Static Linear Finite Elements Analysis

Overview
Journal Dent Mater
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2006 Jan 13
PMID 16406084
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed at evaluating different restoring configurations of a crownless maxillary central incisor, in order to compare the biomechanical behavior of the restored tooth with that of a sound tooth.

Materials And Methods: A 3D FE model of a maxillary central incisor is presented. An arbitrary static force of 10 N was applied with an angulation of 125 degrees to the tooth longitudinal axis at level of the palatal surface of the crown. Different material configurations were tested: composite, syntered alumina, feldspathic ceramic endocrowns and glass post resorations with syntered alumina and feldspathic ceramic crown.

Results: High modulus materials used for the restoration strongly alter the natural biomechanical behavior of the tooth. Critical areas of high stress concentration are the restoration-cement-dentin interface both in the root canal and on the buccal and lingual aspects of the tooth-restoration interface. Materials with mechanical properties underposable to that of dentin or enamel improve the biomechanical behavior of the restored tooth reducing the areas of high stress concentration.

Significance: The use of endocrown restorations present the advantage of reducing the interfaces of the restorative system. The choice of the restorative materials should be carefully evaluated. Materials with mechanical properties similar to those of sound teeth improve the reliability of the restoartive system.

Citing Articles

Anterior Endocrowns as An Alternative to Core Crown restorations: A Systematic Review.

Mously H, Naguib G, Abougazia A, Almabadi A, Qutub O, Hamed M Int Dent J. 2024; 75(1):59-74.

PMID: 39306490 PMC: 11806310. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.1216.


Advanced Material Strategy for Restoring Damaged Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Comprehensive Review.

Caussin E, Izart M, Ceinos R, Attal J, Beres F, Francois P Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(15).

PMID: 39124400 PMC: 11313123. DOI: 10.3390/ma17153736.


Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress and cuspal strain in natural and typodont teeth.

Cardoso L, de Oliveira A, Barbosa G, Ribeiro M, Firmiano T, Verissimo C Braz Oral Res. 2024; 38:e061.

PMID: 39109762 PMC: 11376615. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0061.


The effect of restorative material selection and cementation procedures on the durability of endocrowns in the anterior teeth: an in-vitro study.

Samra N, Madina M, El-Negoly S, Dawood L BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):670.

PMID: 38851731 PMC: 11161972. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04381-9.


The fracture resistance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with zirconia crowns, lithium disilicate or resin based ceramic endocrowns.

Ali A, Abo-Elsoud A, Helmy Y BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):583.

PMID: 38764030 PMC: 11103835. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04332-4.