» Articles » PMID: 16405535

Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Patients with Large Gastric Folds at Endoscopy and Biopsies Negative for Malignancy: Predictors of Malignant Disease and Clinical Impact

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2006 Jan 13
PMID 16405535
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aims of the study were to assess in patients with large gastric folds at endoscopy and endoscopic biopsies that tested negative for malignancy: (i) the predictive variables of malignancy in endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), (ii) the impact of EUS.

Methods: Patients with this condition evaluated with radial EUS (following the standard study protocol of our Unit in these patients) during a 5-yr period were included. Nine variables were evaluated as possible predictors of malignancy (chi2, t-test, and logistic regression procedure) using pathology results, or a minimum of 2 yr of follow-up as gold standard. Likelihood ratios (LR), pre-EUS, and post-EUS probabilities for the diagnosis of malignancy were used to assess the clinical impact of the technique.

Results: Sixty-one patients were included (40 benign and 21 malignant). Predictive factors of malignancy were as follows: thickened gastric wall, thickened deep layers, impaired gastric distension, loss of the wall structure, and presence of ascites or lymph nodes, whereas the enlargement of superficial layers was a predictor of a benign condition. The enlargement of deep layers, as assessed by EUS was the only independent predictive factor for malignancy. When using this parameter, the pre-EUS probability of malignancy in our series (34%) increased up to 95% when EUS suggested malignancy (positive LR = 45), whereas it decreased to 4.7% when EUS precluded this diagnosis (negative LR = 0.102).

Conclusions: (i) The enlargement of deep layers is the only independent predictive factor for malignancy in patients with large gastric folds at endoscopy and biopsies testing negative for malignancy and (ii) EUS has a high clinical impact in these patients.

Citing Articles

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of gastric wall thickening: a retrospective study with meta-analysis.

Giri S, Narayan J, Angadi S, Shah B, Ingle M, B K Ann Gastroenterol. 2023; 36(6):605-614.

PMID: 38023968 PMC: 10662068. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0831.


Differential Diagnosis of Thickened Gastric Wall between Hypertrophic Gastritis and Borrmann Type 4 Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Seo J, Kim D, Ahn J, Choi K, Kim H, Na H Gut Liver. 2023; 18(6):961-969.

PMID: 38013478 PMC: 11565008. DOI: 10.5009/gnl230307.


Diagnosis and follow-up value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Fan R, Zhang T, He X, Wu W, Gong T, Lu H Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 10(2):1088-1095.

PMID: 35116436 PMC: 8798852. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-2459.


Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in patients with unexplained diffuse gastrointestinal wall thickening.

Chavarria C, Garcia-Alonso F, Benito-Sanz M, Mata-Romero P, Madrigal B, Sanchez-Ocana R Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9(10):E1466-E1471.

PMID: 34540537 PMC: 8445677. DOI: 10.1055/a-1526-0407.


A quarter century of EUS-FNA: Progress, milestones, and future directions.

Cazacu I, Luzuriaga Chavez A, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Bhutani M Endosc Ultrasound. 2018; 7(3):141-160.

PMID: 29941723 PMC: 6032705. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_19_18.