» Articles » PMID: 16395464

Road Pavers' Occupational Exposure to Asphalt Containing Waste Plastic and Tall Oil Pitch

Overview
Journal J Environ Monit
Date 2006 Jan 6
PMID 16395464
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Waste plastic (WP) and tall oil pitch (T), which are organic recycled industrial by-products, have been used as a binder with bitumen in stone mastic asphalt (SMA) and asphalt concrete (AC). We compared the exposure over one workday in 16 road pavers participating in a survey at four paving sites, using mixes of conventional asphalt (SMA, AC) or mixes containing waste material (SMA-WPT, AC-WPT). The concentrations of 11 aldehydes in air were 515 and 902 microg m(-3) at the SMA-WPT and AC-WPT worksites, being 3 and 13 times greater than at the corresponding worksites laying conventional asphalt. Resin acids (2-42 microg m(-3)), which are known sensitizers, were detected only during laying of AC-WPT. The emission levels (microg m(-3)) of total particulates (300-500), bitumen fumes (60-160), bitumen vapour (80-1120), naphthalene (0.59-1.2), phenanthrene (0.21-0.32), pyrene (<0.015-0.20), benzo(a)pyrene (<0.01) and the sum of 16 PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, 1.28-2.00) were similar for conventional and WPT asphalts. The dermal deposition of 16 PAHs on exposure pads (on workers' wrist) was low in all pavers (0.7-3.5 ng cm(-2)). Eight OH-PAH biomarkers of naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene exposures were quantified in pre- and post-shift urine specimens. The post-shift concentrations (mean +/- SD, micromol mol(-1) creatinine) of 1- plus 2-naphthol; 1-,2-,3-,4- plus 9-phenanthrol; and 1-hydroxypyrene were, respectively, for asphalt workers: 18.1+/- 8.0, 2.41 +/- 0.71 and 0.66+/- 0.58 (smokers); 6.0+/- 2.3, 1.70+/- 0.72 and 0.27+/- 0.15 (non-smokers); WPT asphalt workers: 22.0+/- 9.2, 2.82+/- 1.11 and 0.76+/- 0.18 (smokers); 6.8+/- 2.6, 2.35+/- 0.69 and 0.46+/- 0.13 (non-smokers). The work-related uptake of PAHs was low in all pavers, although it was significantly greater in smokers than in non-smokers. The WPT asphalt workers complained of eye irritation and sore throat more than the pavers who had a much lower exposure to aldehydes and resin acids.

Citing Articles

Primary and Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Asphalt Pavements.

Humes M, Machesky J, Kim S, Oladeji O, Gentner D, Donahue N Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(48):20034-20042.

PMID: 37931038 PMC: 10702534. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c06037.


Genotoxic effect of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in asphalt workers.

Kargar-Shouroki F, Miri M, Sakhvidi M, Hosseini Sangchi S, Madadizadeh F EXCLI J. 2021; 20:686-697.

PMID: 33883991 PMC: 8056049. DOI: 10.17179/excli2021-3487.


Silicone wristbands as personal passive samplers.

OConnell S, Kincl L, Anderson K Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(6):3327-35.

PMID: 24548134 PMC: 3962070. DOI: 10.1021/es405022f.


A case-control study of lung cancer nested in a cohort of European asphalt workers.

Olsson A, Kromhout H, Agostini M, Hansen J, Lassen C, Johansen C Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118(10):1418-24.

PMID: 20529766 PMC: 2957922. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901800.


Comparing urinary biomarkers of airborne and dermal exposure to polycyclic aromatic compounds in asphalt-exposed workers.

Sobus J, McClean M, Herrick R, Waidyanatha S, Nylander-French L, Kupper L Ann Occup Hyg. 2009; 53(6):561-71.

PMID: 19602502 PMC: 2723216. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mep042.