» Articles » PMID: 16388328

Risk-reduction Surgery Decisions in High-risk Women Seen for Genetic Counseling

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2006 Jan 3
PMID 16388328
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Women at greatest risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer may consider prophylactic removal of breasts or ovaries as a risk-reduction measure. This report describes uptake of risk-reduction mastectomy (RRM), risk-reduction oophorectomy (RRO), and related factors in 62 high-risk women who received genetic counseling. Seven (11%) participants underwent RRM and 13 (21%) underwent RRO. Of these women, 37% did not have BRCA testing, suggesting other factors influence decisions to undergo surgery. Women who had indicated (pre-genetic counseling) their intent not to have surgery chose not to have surgery. Information received during genetic counseling that women perceived as being most important for influencing risk-reduction surgery decisions was BRCA test result (positive or negative), followed by discussion of family cancer history. Reasons for indecision about risk-reduction surgery included genetic testing results, concerns about surgery, timing in life, and early menopause. The findings enhance our understanding of information that is helpful to women considering this surgery.

Citing Articles

Optimization of Timing for Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy and Oophorectomy.

Pennington K, Pugh S, Huh W, Walker J, Jewell E, Havrilesky L Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 145(1):21-30.

PMID: 39509704 PMC: 11637911. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005781.


Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey.

Padamsee T, Bijou C, Swinehart-Hord P, Hils M, Muraveva A, Meadows R Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):8.

PMID: 38212792 PMC: 10785448. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01753-x.


Breast Cancer Risk and Breast-Cancer-Specific Mortality following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gaba F, Blyuss O, Tan A, Munblit D, Oxley S, Khan K Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 36900415 PMC: 10001253. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051625.


Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study.

Gaba F, Blyuss O, Chandrasekaran D, Osman M, Goyal S, Gan C BJOG. 2020; 128(4):714-726.

PMID: 32803845 PMC: 7614715. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16424.


Involvement and Influence of Healthcare Providers, Family Members, and Other Mutation Carriers in the Cancer Risk Management Decision-Making Process of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Puski A, Hovick S, Senter L, Toland A J Genet Couns. 2018; 27(5):1291-1301.

PMID: 29594659 PMC: 6612901. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0254-4.


References
1.
Moller P, Borg A, Evans D, Haites N, Reis M, Vasen H . Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy. Int J Cancer. 2002; 101(6):555-9. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10641. View

2.
Hallowell N . A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy. Psychooncology. 2001; 9(6):486-95. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<486::aid-pon478>3.0.co;2-y. View

3.
Schrag D, Kuntz K, Garber J, Weeks J . Life expectancy gains from cancer prevention strategies for women with breast cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. JAMA. 2000; 283(5):617-24. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.5.617. View

4.
Lynch H, Casey M . Current status of prophylactic surgery for hereditary breast and gynecologic cancers. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 13(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1097/00001703-200102000-00004. View

5.
Lerman C, Hughes C, Croyle R, Main D, Durham C, Snyder C . Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing. Prev Med. 2000; 31(1):75-80. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0684. View