» Articles » PMID: 1638263

On the Kinetics and Optimal Specificity of Cytotoxic Reactions Mediated by T-lymphocyte Clones

Overview
Journal Bull Math Biol
Publisher Springer
Specialties Biology
Public Health
Date 1992 Sep 1
PMID 1638263
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using the chromium release assay and the single cell assay in agarose, we study the cytotoxic reaction of the MHC-restricted T lymphocyte clones P89:15 and P1:3, which recognize distinct but specific tumour antigens on the surface of syngeneic P815 mastocytoma cells. We propose a mathematical model which describes these experiments, accounts for the strongly non-Michaelian behaviour of the reaction and permits us to estimate the kinetic parameters characterizing effector-target conjugation and lethal hit delivery. The results show that the binding and lytic activity of effector cells is modulated by the number of targets bound to them. The binding of a second target by an effector having already a target bound is facilitated; on the other hand, an effector having bound two targets delivers a lethal hit more slowly than one with a single target bound. We investigate the role of these kinetic properties in the competition between the process of tumour progression due to cancer cell replication and the process of tumour regression due to T lymphocyte cytotoxic activity. For both clones, we estimate the effector-target ratio beyond which rejection prevails. This ratio is nine times larger for P1:3 than for P89:15. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that there exists an optimal specificity minimizing this ratio. Deviations from this optimum, be it in the sense of an increase or decrease of specificity, tends to stabilize the tumoural state: a situation which in the broader context of the immune response evolution and regulation can be viewed as an immune response dilemma.

Citing Articles

Nonlinear dynamics of immunogenic tumors: parameter estimation and global bifurcation analysis.

Kuznetsov V, Makalkin I, Taylor M, Perelson A Bull Math Biol. 1994; 56(2):295-321.

PMID: 8186756 DOI: 10.1007/BF02460644.

References
1.
Howe R, Russell J . Analysis of the binding and postbinding activities of an inducible cloned CTL line at the population and the single-cell level. J Immunol. 1985; 134(5):2922-9. View

2.
Uyttenhove C, Maryanski J, Boon T . Escape of mouse mastocytoma P815 after nearly complete rejection is due to antigen-loss variants rather than immunosuppression. J Exp Med. 1983; 157(3):1040-52. PMC: 2186952. DOI: 10.1084/jem.157.3.1040. View

3.
Sekaly R, MacDonald H, Zaech P, Glasebrook A, Cerottini J . Cytolytic T lymphocyte function is independent of growth phase and position in the mitotic cycle. J Exp Med. 1981; 154(2):575-80. PMC: 2186426. DOI: 10.1084/jem.154.2.575. View

4.
Wagner H, Rollinghoff M . T cell-mediated cytotoxicity: discrimination between antigen recognition, lethal hit and cytolysis phase. Eur J Immunol. 1974; 4(11):745-50. DOI: 10.1002/eji.1830041108. View

5.
Young J, Liu C . Multiple mechanisms of lymphocyte-mediated killing. Immunol Today. 1988; 9(5):140-4. DOI: 10.1016/0167-5699(88)91201-7. View