» Articles » PMID: 16377776

Use of a Mixed Tissue RNA Design for Performance Assessments on Multiple Microarray Formats

Abstract

The comparability and reliability of data generated using microarray technology would be enhanced by use of a common set of standards that allow accuracy, reproducibility and dynamic range assessments on multiple formats. We designed and tested a complex biological reagent for performance measurements on three commercial oligonucleotide array formats that differ in probe design and signal measurement methodology. The reagent is a set of two mixtures with different proportions of RNA for each of four rat tissues (brain, liver, kidney and testes). The design provides four known ratio measurements of >200 reference probes, which were chosen for their tissue-selectivity, dynamic range coverage and alignment to the same exemplar transcript sequence across all three platforms. The data generated from testing three biological replicates of the reagent at eight laboratories on three array formats provides a benchmark set for both laboratory and data processing performance assessments. Close agreement with target ratios adjusted for sample complexity was achieved on all platforms and low variance was observed among platforms, replicates and sites. The mixed tissue design produces a reagent with known gene expression changes within a complex sample and can serve as a paradigm for performance standards for microarrays that target other species.

Citing Articles

Teaching computational genomics and bioinformatics on a high performance computing cluster-a primer.

Sethuraman A Biol Methods Protoc. 2022; 7(1):bpac032.

PMID: 36561335 PMC: 9767868. DOI: 10.1093/biomethods/bpac032.


A framework for assessing 16S rRNA marker-gene survey data analysis methods using mixtures.

Olson N, Kumar M, Li S, Braccia D, Hao S, Timp W Microbiome. 2020; 8(1):35.

PMID: 32169095 PMC: 7071580. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00812-1.


Summarizing performance for genome scale measurement of miRNA: reference samples and metrics.

Pine P, Lund S, Parsons J, Vang L, Mahabal A, Cinquini L BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):180.

PMID: 29510677 PMC: 5838960. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4496-1.


Using mixtures of biological samples as process controls for RNA-sequencing experiments.

Parsons J, Munro S, Pine P, McDaniel J, Mehaffey M, Salit M BMC Genomics. 2015; 16:708.

PMID: 26383878 PMC: 4574543. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1912-7.


Relative impact of key sources of systematic noise in Affymetrix and Illumina gene-expression microarray experiments.

Kitchen R, Sabine V, Simen A, Dixon J, Bartlett J, Sims A BMC Genomics. 2011; 12:589.

PMID: 22133085 PMC: 3269440. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-589.


References
1.
Fare T, Coffey E, Dai H, He Y, Kessler D, Kilian K . Effects of atmospheric ozone on microarray data quality. Anal Chem. 2003; 75(17):4672-5. DOI: 10.1021/ac034241b. View

2.
Moreau Y, Aerts S, De Moor B, De Strooper B, Dabrowski M . Comparison and meta-analysis of microarray data: from the bench to the computer desk. Trends Genet. 2003; 19(10):570-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.006. View

3.
Mecham B, Klus G, Strovel J, Augustus M, Byrne D, Bozso P . Sequence-matched probes produce increased cross-platform consistency and more reproducible biological results in microarray-based gene expression measurements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(9):e74. PMC: 419626. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnh071. View

4.
Shi L, Tong W, Goodsaid F, Frueh F, Fang H, Han T . QA/QC: challenges and pitfalls facing the microarray community and regulatory agencies. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004; 4(6):761-77. DOI: 10.1586/14737159.4.6.761. View

5.
Hughes T, Mao M, Jones A, Burchard J, Marton M, Shannon K . Expression profiling using microarrays fabricated by an ink-jet oligonucleotide synthesizer. Nat Biotechnol. 2001; 19(4):342-7. DOI: 10.1038/86730. View