» Articles » PMID: 16372824

High Variability of Indinavir and Nelfinavir Pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected Patients with a Sustained Virological Response on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Abstract

Objectives: To describe plasma concentrations of indinavir alone or combined with ritonavir, and of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8, and to measure their variabilities in HIV-infected patients treated with a stable antiretroviral regimen and experiencing a sustained virological response for at least 12 months.

Patients And Methods: In this prospective trial, blood samples were drawn during a 6-hour time interval between two doses at enrolment to assess protease inhibitor (PI) pharmacokinetic parameters, and 4 months later to assess plasma trough and peak concentrations. Safety and adherence assessments and laboratory data were collected during an 8-month period. PI pharmacokinetic characteristics were analysed using a non-compartmental approach. Inter- and intrapatient variabilities were estimated using a linear mixed-effect model. The impact of different covariates on plasma trough concentrations was investigated. Eighty-eight patients were analysed: 42 treated with indinavir and 46 with nelfinavir.

Results: The interquartile range (IQR) of the plasma trough concentration corrected for the sampling time (Ccalc) was 116-374 microg/L for indinavir alone and 163-508 microg/L for indinavir/ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly increased indinavir elimination half-life and plasma exposure. For nelfinavir, the IQR of Ccalc was 896-2059 microg/L for three-times-daily administration and 998-2124 microg/L for twice-daily administration. Variabilities were high for both PIs. Intrapatient variability for indinavir alone (and indinavir + ritonavir) was 76% (107%) and interpatient variability was 58% (10%) in adherent patients. Intrapatient variability for nelfinavir three times daily (and twice daily) was 41% (74%) and interpatient variability was 62% (50%). Intrapatient variability was lowered in patients with a high adherence level.

Conclusion: Although performed in a homogeneous population, this study documented a high interpatient but also intrapatient variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics, which should be taken into account when interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring. Once patients have reached a sustained virological response, plasma PI monitoring may have a limited impact.

Citing Articles

Can we Predict Drug Excretion into Saliva? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Physicochemical Properties.

Nguyen T, Chen R, Hawkins B, Hibbs D, Kim H, Wheate N Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024; 63(8):1067-1087.

PMID: 39008243 PMC: 11343830. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-024-01398-9.


An inhibitor of HIV-1 protease modulates constitutive eIF2α dephosphorylation to trigger a specific integrated stress response.

de Gassart A, Bujisic B, Zaffalon L, Decosterd L, Di Micco A, Frera G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 113(2):E117-26.

PMID: 26715744 PMC: 4720296. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514076113.


Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in older persons.

Schoen J, Erlandson K, Anderson P Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2013; 9(5):573-88.

PMID: 23514375 PMC: 3673886. DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2013.781153.


Pharmacokinetic modelling of efavirenz, atazanavir, lamivudine and tenofovir in the female genital tract of HIV-infected pre-menopausal women.

Dumond J, Nicol M, Kendrick R, Garonzik S, Patterson K, Cohen M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012; 51(12):809-22.

PMID: 23044523 PMC: 3508718. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-012-0012-y.


Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic study of nevirapine in HIV-infected Cambodian patients.

Chou M, Bertrand J, Segeral O, Verstuyft C, Borand L, Comets E Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54(10):4432-9.

PMID: 20696882 PMC: 2944557. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00512-10.


References
1.
Carr A . HIV lipodystrophy: risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. AIDS. 2003; 17 Suppl 1:S141-8. View

2.
Dieleman J, Gyssens I, van der Ende M, de Marie S, Burger D . Urological complaints in relation to indinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 1999; 13(4):473-8. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199903110-00005. View

3.
Pfister M, Labbe L, Hammer S, Mellors J, Bennett K, Rosenkranz S . Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and indinavir: Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group Study 398. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 47(1):130-7. PMC: 148981. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.130-137.2003. View

4.
Clayette P, Jorajuria S, Dormont D . Significance of P-glycoprotein for the pharmacology and clinical use of HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS. 2000; 14(3):235-6. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200002180-00004. View

5.
Moing V, Peytavin G, Journot V, Cottalorda J, Bouvet E, Chene G . Plasma levels of indinavir and nelfinavir at time of virologic response may have a different impact on the risk of further virologic failure in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003; 34(5):497-9. DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200312150-00008. View