» Articles » PMID: 16365178

Phase III Clinical Trial of Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone Compared with Dexamethasone Alone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: a Clinical Trial Coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2005 Dec 21
PMID 16365178
Citations 230
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine if thalidomide plus dexamethasone yields superior response rates compared with dexamethasone alone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Patients And Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive thalidomide plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone. Patients in arm A received thalidomide 200 mg orally for 4 weeks; dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 40 mg orally on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients in arm B received dexamethasone alone at the same schedule as in arm A.

Results: Two hundred seven patients were enrolled: 103 were randomly assigned to thalidomide plus dexamethasone and 104 were randomly assigned to dexamethasone alone; eight patients were ineligible. The response rate with thalidomide plus dexamethasone was significantly higher than with dexamethasone alone (63% v 41%, respectively; P = .0017). The response rate allowing for use of serum monoclonal protein levels when a measurable urine monoclonal protein was unavailable at follow-up was 72% v 50%, respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 or higher deep vein thrombosis (DVT), rash, bradycardia, neuropathy, and any grade 4 to 5 toxicity in the first 4 months were significantly higher with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone (45% v 21%, respectively; P < .001). DVT was more frequent in arm A than in arm B (17% v 3%); grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was also more frequent (7% v 4%, respectively).

Conclusion: Thalidomide plus dexamethasone demonstrates significantly superior response rates in newly diagnosed myeloma compared with dexamethasone alone. However, this must be balanced against the greater toxicity seen with the combination.

Citing Articles

Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Its Associated Risk Factors in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.

Abdul Aziz N, Palaniappan S, Kamal Rodin N, Chong G, Jerome T, Aizuddin A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941428 PMC: 11818754. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030759.


The factors affecting the survivability of malignant cancer patients with deep vein thrombosis among subjects with gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancer: An ambispective cohort study.

Rachman A, Christine G, Betsy R, Juanputra S, Pratiwi W F1000Res. 2024; 12:890.

PMID: 39479230 PMC: 11522705. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.135252.2.


Repurposing NAMPT Inhibitors for Germinal Center B Cell-Like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Scuoppo C, Cai B, Ofori K, Scholze H, Kumar R, DAlessandro A Blood Cancer Discov. 2024; 5(6):417-427.

PMID: 39105568 PMC: 11528193. DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-24-0020.


Discovering Potential in Non-Cancer Medications: A Promising Breakthrough for Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Al-Odat O, Nelson E, Budak-Alpdogan T, Jonnalagadda S, Desai D, Pandey M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001443 PMC: 11240591. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132381.


Thrombotic Risk and Calculated Whole Blood Viscosity in a Cohort of Patients With New Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma.

Carlisi M, Lo Presti R, Mancuso S, Siragusa S, Caimi G Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024; 30:10760296231222477.

PMID: 38173275 PMC: 10768600. DOI: 10.1177/10760296231222477.