» Articles » PMID: 16365001

No Evidence of False Reassurance Among Women with an Inconclusive BRCA1/2 Genetic Test Result

Overview
Date 2005 Dec 21
PMID 16365001
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little is known about how women who receive an inconclusive result from BRCA1/2 testing interpret their result. Clinical observations suggest that some of them may be falsely reassured and, consequently, may not adhere to recommended surveillance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether women with inconclusive BRCA1/2 test results are falsely reassured.

Methods: Participants were adult women with a family history suggestive of a germ-line mutation in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene who underwent genetic testing in the context of the interdisciplinary research program INHERIT BRCAs. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires at genetic counseling and 1 month after result disclosure. Reassurance was assessed through indicators of cancer risk perception, cancer worry, relief following result disclosure, painfulness of the test result, and its effect on quality of life.

Results: Five-hundred women (105 carriers, 140 noncarriers, and 255 inconclusive) were included in this analysis. Compared to noncarriers, women with inconclusive results had higher cancer risk perception, were more worried about cancer, were less relieved by their test result, and perceived their quality of life as being more adversely affected by it.

Conclusion: The differences observed between noncarriers and women who received an inconclusive result run counter to the hypothesis that the latter are falsely reassured following BRCA1/2 testing. For clinicians, our findings show the value of taking precautions to fully explain to women that inconclusive results do not rule out the possibility that they still may face a higher risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Citing Articles

Uncertainty following an inconclusive result from the BRCA1/2 genetic test: A review about psychological outcomes.

Bramanti S, Trumello C, Lombardi L, Cavallo A, Stuppia L, Antonucci I World J Psychiatry. 2021; 11(5):189-200.

PMID: 34046315 PMC: 8134867. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i5.189.


Female family members lack understanding of indeterminate negative BRCA1/2 test results shared by probands.

Himes D, Gibbons D, Birmingham W, Beckstrand R, Gammon A, Kinney A J Genet Couns. 2019; 28(5):950-961.

PMID: 31199558 PMC: 7340114. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1147.


Risk-reducing mastectomy rates in the US: a closer examination of the Angelina Jolie effect.

Liede A, Cai M, Crouter T, Niepel D, Callaghan F, Evans D Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 171(2):435-442.

PMID: 29808287 PMC: 6096880. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4824-9.


Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Catania C, Feroce I, Barile M, Goldhirsch A, De Pas T, De Braud F J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015; 142(3):633-48.

PMID: 26577826 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2062-7.


Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.

Middlemass J, Yazdani M, Kai J, Standen P, Qureshi N Br J Gen Pract. 2014; 64(622):e282-9.

PMID: 24771842 PMC: 4001138. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X679714.