» Articles » PMID: 16360860

Maxillary Stability Following Le Fort I Osteotomy in Combination with Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: a Comparative Study Between Titanium Miniplate and Poly-L-lactic Acid Plate

Overview
Date 2005 Dec 20
PMID 16360860
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy with titanium miniplate and poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) plate (Fixsorb-MX; Takiron Co, Osaka, Japan).

Patients And Methods: The subjects were composed of 47 Japanese patients with diagnosed jaw deformity: 24 underwent Le Fort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO); and 23 underwent Le Fort I osteotomy intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy without internal fixation. Each group was divided into titanium plate and PLLA plate groups. Time course changes between plate groups were compared using lateral and posteroanterior cephalography.

Results: Significant differences were identified between titanium plate and PLLA plate groups in A point after Le Fort I osteotomy and SSRO (P < .05). Significant differences existed between titanium plate and PLLA plate groups in vertical component of posterior nasal spine after Le Fort I osteotomy in both combinations with SSRO and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (P < .05). However, no significant differences were identified in measurements on posteroanterior cephalography.

Conclusion: These results suggest a slight tendency for vertical impaction after Le Fort I osteotomy both in combination with SSRO and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with PLLA plates, although differences in time course changes were not clinically apparent, and normal occlusion was established in all patients.

Citing Articles

Changes in mandibular width and frontal-lower facial profile after orthognathic surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with removal of internal bone interference in patients with class III skeletal malocclusion.

Song I, Kang M, Lee J, Bae E, Kim B, Kim C Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 46(1):33.

PMID: 39254790 PMC: 11387562. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-024-00444-7.


Evaluation of Hard and Soft Tissue Responses to Four Different Generation Bioresorbable Materials-Poly-l-Lactic Acid (PLLA), Poly-l-Lactic Acid/Polyglycolic Acid (PLLA/PGA), Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic Acid (u-HA/PLLA) and....

Ayasaka K, Ramanathan M, Huy N, Shijirbold A, Okui T, Tatsumi H Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(23).

PMID: 38068124 PMC: 10707338. DOI: 10.3390/ma16237379.


Comparison study of the Le Fort I osteotomy using 2- and 4-plate fixation.

Fujio M, Sayo A, Ogisu K, Chang Q, Tsuboi M, Hibi H Nagoya J Med Sci. 2023; 85(1):70-78.

PMID: 36923624 PMC: 10009623. DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.85.1.70.


Induced osteogenesis using biodegradable and titanium periosteal distractors.

Madi M Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33(7):434-440.

PMID: 34803283 PMC: 8589570. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.12.008.


Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Gareb B, van Bakelen N, Dijkstra P, Vissink A, Bos R, van Minnen B Eur J Oral Sci. 2021; 129(5):e12800.

PMID: 34131965 PMC: 8596673. DOI: 10.1111/eos.12800.