» Articles » PMID: 16351733

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale: a Cross-sectional Study of Psychometrics and Case Finding Abilities in General Practice

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2005 Dec 15
PMID 16351733
Citations 213
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: General practitioners' (GPs) diagnostic skills lead to underidentification of generalized anxiety disorders (GAD) and major depressive episodes (MDE). Supplement of brief questionnaires could improve the diagnostic accuracy of GPs for these common mental disorders. The aims of this study were to examine the usefulness of The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale (HADS) for GPs by: 1) Examining its psychometrics in the GPs' setting; 2) Testing its case-finding properties compared to patient-rated GAD and MDE (DSM-IV); and 3) Comparing its case finding abilities to that of the GPs using Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) rating.

Methods: In a cross-sectional survey study 1,781 patients in three consecutive days in September 2001 attended 141 GPs geographically spread in Norway. Sensitivity, specificity, optimal cut off score, and Area under the curve (AUC) for the HADS and the CGI-S were calculated with Generalized Anxiety Questionnaire (GAS-Q) as reference standard for GAD, and Depression Screening Questionnaire (DSQ) for MDE.

Results: The HADS-A had optimal cut off > or =8 (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.75), AUC 0.88 and 76% of patients were correctly classified in relation to GAD. The HADS-D had by optimal cut off > or =8 (sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.88) AUC 0.93 and 87% of the patients were correctly classified in relation to MDE. Proportions of the total correctly classified at the CGI-S optimal cut-off > or =3 were 83% of patients for GAD and 81% for MDE.

Conclusion: The results indicate that addition of the patients' HADS scores to GPs' information could improve their diagnostic accuracy of GAD and MDE.

Citing Articles

Neuroleptics used in critical COVID associated with moderate-severe dyspnea after hospital discharge.

Toufen Jr C, de Almeida G, Pompeu J, de Carvalho C, de Carvalho C Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6744.

PMID: 40000709 PMC: 11862020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91010-2.


Evolution of quality of life, anxiety, and depression over time in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold.

Vanmaele A, Branidis P, Karamanidou M, Bouwens E, Hoeks S, de Bruin J BJS Open. 2025; 9(1.

PMID: 39792053 PMC: 11720167. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae150.


Validation of visual analog scales of mood and anxiety at the workplace.

Dutheil F, Palgen C, Brousse G, Cornet T, Mermillod M, Lakbar I PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0316159.

PMID: 39739967 PMC: 11687878. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316159.


Neuropsychiatric complications in chronic kidney disease: Role of gender, clinical, and sociodemographic factors.

Tesia S, Nongpiur A, Barman B, Lyngdoh M, Prithviraj M, Roy D J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(11):5077-5082.

PMID: 39722983 PMC: 11668418. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_607_24.


Clinical importance of patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: results from U-BIOPRED.

Meys R, Franssen F, van t Hul A, Bakke P, Caruso M, Dahlen B Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):109.

PMID: 39707320 PMC: 11662558. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02321-3.


References
1.
Kessler R . The epidemiology of pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder: a review and evaluation of recent research. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2000; (406):7-13. View

2.
Wittchen H, Boyer P . Screening for anxiety disorders. Sensitivity and specificity of the Anxiety Screening Questionnaire (ASQ-15). Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1998; (34):10-7. View

3.
Engstrom S, Foldevi M, Borgquist L . Is general practice effective? A systematic literature review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2001; 19(2):131-44. DOI: 10.1080/028134301750235394. View

4.
Mykletun A, Stordal E, Dahl A . Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale: factor structure, item analyses and internal consistency in a large population. Br J Psychiatry. 2001; 179:540-4. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.179.6.540. View

5.
Crawford J, Henry J, Crombie C, TAYLOR E . Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2002; 40(4):429-34. DOI: 10.1348/014466501163904. View